Toronto, ON · Charitable organization
Slavic Evangelical Baptist Church
Church worship services and Church Sunday School.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LIGHT TO THE WORLD CHRISTIAN CHURCH | C$5,000 |
| Jewish Family And Child Service Of Greater Toronto | C$2,000 |
| The Union of Slavic Churches of Evangelical Christians | C$1,180 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against -7% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TUTHE UNION OF SLAVIC CHURCHES OF EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS7× · 2017–2024 · C$47k · revenue +263% · 47% of their budget
- LTLIGHT TO THE WORLD CHRISTIAN CHURCH2× · 2023–2024 · C$11k · revenue +38%
- JFJewish Family and Child Service2× · 2023–2024 · C$4k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- SGSlavic Gospel Associationgraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$2k · revenue +50%
- IMIMPACT MINISTRY GROUP CHURCH PLANTING INCone grant, 2021 · C$1k · revenue -7%
- CBCANADIAN BAPTISTS OF ONTARIO AND QUEBECone grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue -130%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to support and partner with Christian churches and relief organizations around the world to share our faith disciple teach train and serve. We focus on Church Planting & Evangelism Relief & Development and Leadership…
Support for church leader orphanage church and bible school in india. ongoing support for a church and orphanage in ukraine building up several ukranian churches spiritually with crusades construction of a church support for a potato farm…
Planting of new churches world missions leadership development
Promote teach and encourage involvement in world missions. support independent baptist church planting.
Planting new churches supporting existing church plants
Developing ministries and christian leadership by training pastors and lay workers funding missionary outreach program including attendance by chairman in countries where mission work is done
Don wallis ministries supports churches in kazakhstan cuba israel russia usa
International and national evangelism and church planting support of other christian ministries .
Christian Missions funding to advance the Christian Gospel
International Christian Ministries (ICM) trains and equips Christian leaders in Africa Eastern Europe and Latin America with and through its agents. These training initiatives include various Christian seminars and conferences facilitating…
Write print + distribute christian literature + support mission work
Singing and speaking in churches; supporting missionnaries and orphans
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Union of Slavic Churches of Evangelical Christians and Slavic Baptist of Canada and the most unlike its peers is Bopoma Villages. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE UNION OF SLAVIC CHURCHES OF EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS ↗
- Who funds LIGHT TO THE WORLD CHRISTIAN CHURCH ↗
- Who funds BOPOMA VILLAGES ↗
- Who funds Jewish Family and Child Service ↗
- Who funds Slavic Gospel Association ↗
- Who funds IMPACT MINISTRY GROUP CHURCH PLANTING INC ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN BAPTISTS OF ONTARIO AND QUEBEC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL-CHRISTIAN NATIONALS EVANGELISM MISSIO ↗
- Who funds Jubilance Ministries ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.