Toronto, ON · Charitable organization
Sinai Health System
Sinai Health System is a public teaching and research hospital.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k4 grants · C$15k
- C$10k–50k5 grants · C$155k
- C$50k–250k4 grants · C$592k
- C$250k+4 grants · C$2.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL | C$764,447 |
| NORTHSHORE UNIVERSITY HEALTHSYSTEM RESEARCH INSTITUTE | C$517,334 |
| WITS HEALTH CONSORTIUM | C$474,728 |
| SWAMI VIVEKANANDA YOUTH MOVEMENT | C$309,011 |
| PRINCETON UNIVERSITY | C$237,762 |
| SANGATH | C$209,842 |
| CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERISTY | C$75,761 |
| UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL | C$68,715 |
| DIMAGI INC | C$37,697 |
| SOUTHERN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY | C$35,595 |
| PRESIDENT & FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE | C$35,009 |
| INTERNATIONAL AGENCY FOR RESEARCH ON CANCER | C$26,688 |
| SHAARE ZEDEK MEDICAL CENTER | C$20,000 |
| MANSOUR UNIVERSITY | C$6,257 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$3,709 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 1% of grant dollars (C$51k). The 99% that went abroad (C$9.5M) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 99% of all-years giving (C$9.5M)
8 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1.7M went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- NCNORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL4× · 2021–2024 · C$3.4M
- PUPRINCETON UNIVERSITY4× · 2019–2024 · C$2.0M
- UOUNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL5× · 2020–2024 · C$298k
Funded once
- PUPRICETON UNIVERSITYone grant, 2021 · C$994k
- UOUNIVERISTY OF MANCHESTER THEone grant, 2019 · C$124k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT HOUSTONone grant, 2020 · C$84k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.