Skip to content

Brampton, ON · Charitable organization

Shree Ganesh Yag Pariwar

1) we donate funds to registered charities in canada.

C$6k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$3k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$625
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$332k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HINDU HERITAGE CENTREC$2,804
CAMBRIDGE SELF HELP FOOD BANKC$625
KNIGHTS TABLE BRAMPTONC$625
NEIGHBOUR 2 NEIGHBOURC$625
FOOD BANK MISSISSAUGAC$625
PRINCESS MARGARET CANCER FOUNDATIONC$500
HAMILTON HINDU SAMAJ TEMPLEC$251
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$58k · 8 repeat orgsC$7k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +214% since the first grant, against -20% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
7

Total granted

C$58k
C$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+214%
-20%

Still filing today

88%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • N2
    NEIGHBOUR 2 NEIGHBOUR
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$4k · revenue +77%
  • CS
    CAMBRIDGE SELF HELP FOOD BANK
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$4k · revenue +469%
  • PM
    PRINCESS MARGARET CANCER FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$3k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • CR
    CANADIAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2021 · C$2k · revenue -22%
  • SH
    SHUBH HELPING HANDS
    one grant, 2021 · C$2k · revenue -52%
  • CM
    Chinmaya Mission Toronto
    one grant, 2018 · C$1k · revenue +1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Markham Food Bank

Alleviate food insecurity for markham community members

—
2
Central Food Network

Our mission is to relieve poverty by providing food heating supplies & other basic necessities for people who are of low income & in need. We operate two food banks a food distribution hub a Community Cooks meal program & Heat Bank…

—
3
Burlington Food Bank

We operate a food bank serving residents of Burlington Ontario. During 2024 we employed 10 full-time employees and 6 part time /seasonal employees. Our volunteers worked a total of 13 757 hours. The Halton Food Connect project which…

—
4
The Food Bank of Waterloo Region

The food bank of waterloo region (the food bank) acquires coordinates and distributes food to the community food assistance network - a system of 100+ community organizations providing food and support to those in need. these organizations…

—
5
Scarborough Food Security Initiative

Feed scarborough in 2018 started out as a small organization handing out holiday hampers during the month of december. it wasn’t until the covid-19 pandemic hit in march 2020 that feed scarborough became such a vital social service in…

—
6
Yogic Health and Food Bank Canada
—
7
Toronto Vegetarian Food Bank

Operating the food bank to relieve poverty and food insecurity for those in need in Toronto

—
8
Second Harvest Canada Deuxième Récolte Canada

Second harvest is canada's largest food rescue organization and a global thought leader on perishable food recovery. operating at the intersection of hunger relief and environmental protection second harvest rescues perishable…

—
9
Healthbridge Foundation of Canada

HealthBridge works with partners world-wide to improve health and health equity through research policy and action in the following programming areas: Food and Nutrition: combating hunger and malnutrition and improving food security;…

—
10
Regina & District Food Bank Inc.

Food insecurity remains a critical health issue in Regina affecting over 25 000 people daily. The Regina Food Bank has evolved since 1982 from offering short-term relief to becoming an essential partner in combating hunger in our…

—
11
The Ottawa Food Bank/La Banque D'alimentation D'ottawa

During this fiscal period the ottawa food bank (ofb) has actively pursued its mission to combat food insecurity through a range of charitable programs. the organization operates as a non-profit providing both fresh and non-perishable food…

—
12
Huron County Food Bank Distribution Centre Inc.

The Huron County Food Bank Distribution Centre (HCFBDC)’s purpose is to source and supply food and hygiene products for distribution to the food banks and aid agencies that we serve in Huron and Perth Counties. We also run a monthly Mobile…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighbour to Neighbour Centre (Hamilton) and the most unlike its peers is Maharashtra Seva Samiti Organization. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEIGHBOUR 2 NEIGHBOUR — C$3,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCAMBRIDGE SELF HELP FOOD BANK — C$3,750 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPRINCESS MARGARET CANCER FOUNDATION — C$3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKNIGHTS TABLE — C$2,375 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANKS CANADA — C$2,225 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN RED CROSS — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHUBH HELPING HANDS — C$1,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHAMILTON HINDU SAMAJ TEMPLE — C$1,255 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMississauga Food Bank — C$1,025 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChinmaya Mission Toronto — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMAHARASHTRA SEVA SAMITI ORGANIZATION — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOFXAM CANADA — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEIGHBOUR 2 NEIGHBOUR ↗
  • Who funds CAMBRIDGE SELF HELP FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds PRINCESS MARGARET CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KNIGHTS TABLE ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANKS CANADA ↗
  • Who funds CANADIAN RED CROSS ↗
  • Who funds SHUBH HELPING HANDS ↗
  • Who funds HAMILTON HINDU SAMAJ TEMPLE ↗
  • Who funds Mississauga Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds Chinmaya Mission Toronto ↗
  • Who funds MAHARASHTRA SEVA SAMITI ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds OFXAM CANADA ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

BenefAction FoundationON6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: BenefAction Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · United Way of Greater Toronto · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under public amenities.

Source object 865235691:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Shree Ganesh Yag Pariwar’s filings →