Skip to content

Richmond Hill, ON · Charitable organization

Shaarei Zion Community Centre

Maintained a jewish faith religious day school of instruction for children youth and adults operated a community centre for the benefit of the general public provided employment training and counselling funding construction of a religious centre

C$122k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$47k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k8 grants · C$19k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$103k
C$3,800
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JHFC$46,800
KESER TORAHC$46,000
JBCTC$10,000
KAYLA'S CHILDREN CENTREC$5,150
BAIS YAAKOV OF THORNHILLC$4,018
YESHIVA YESODEI HATORAHC$3,800
THE TORONTO CHEDERC$2,100
BETH JAKOB HIGHT SCHOOLC$2,000
BEIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOLC$1,200
ACHIMC$840
KOL TORAC$126
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$257k · 6 repeat orgsC$109k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

C$257k
C$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+32%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$18k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • J
    JHF
    3× · 2021–2024 · C$90k · revenue +75%
  • KT
    Keter Torah
    2× · 2021–2023 · C$63k · revenue +245% · 27% of their budget
  • J
    JBCT
    2× · 2021–2024 · C$19k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • YK
    YESHIVAS KESER TORAH
    one grant, 2022 · C$60k · revenue -12% · 44% of their budget
  • YK
    YESHIVAS KESSER TORAH
    one grant, 2018 · C$30k
  • TC
    Toronto Chesed Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$1k · revenue +32%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
2
Yeshiva Torah Temimah

The school educates high-school age male students in both secular and jewish studies in a non-conventional way offering more attention than normal to each student.

—
3
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
4
Yeshiva Ateres Yisroel

Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.

—
5
Yeshivas Nachalas Zvi

Operating a postsecondary institution for educating boys in orthodox jewish faith.

—
6
Yeshiva Gedolah Zichron Shmayahu

Maintained a religious school for the training and instruction of religious scholars maintained a house of worship in compliance with the requirements and practices of the jewish faith in the orthodox tradition.

—
7
Beth Hamedrash L'horaah

Operate a school for teaching religious studies

—
8
The Institute of Torah Education

The institute of torah education advances religion by teaching students doctrines observances and culture associated with the orthodox jewish faith.

—
9
The Jewish Connection: Kesher Yisrael

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines observances and culture associated with the jewish orthodox faith

—
10
Kollel Toldos Yakov Yosef
—
11
Mesorah Montessori School

Advance the teachings of the jewish faith religious tenets and doctrines.

—
12
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Yesodei Hatora and the most unlike its peers is Toronto Chesed Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
5/15
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJHF — C$90,310 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKESER TORAH — C$75,700 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetKeter Torah — C$62,600 over 2y, 27% of budgetYESHIVAS KESER TORAH — C$60,102 over 1y, 44% of budgetJBCT — C$19,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetTHE JOE DWEK OHR SEPHARDIC SCHOOL — C$6,052 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKAYLA'S CHILDREN CENTRE — C$5,150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV OF THORNHILL — C$4,018 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYESHIVA YESODEI HATORAH — C$3,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBais Yaakov Elementary School — C$3,355 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TORONTO CHEDER — C$2,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETH JAKOB HIGHT SCHOOL — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetToronto Chesed Foundation — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACHIM — C$840 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKOL TORA — C$126 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Zichron Binyomin Charity FoundationON12.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · The B&C Zy Gezunt Charitable Foundation · Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation · The George Hofstedter Family Foundation · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation · Rayjo Charitable Trust · My Charity Fund · The Jewish Legacy Charitable Foundation · The Weitz Family Foundation · Zolty Charitable Foundation · Moral Arc Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under public amenities.

Source object 874579907:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Shaarei Zion Community Centre’s filings →