Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Toronto, ON · Charitable organization

Shaarei Tzedec Congregation

Synagogue operations cemetery operations

C$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$408
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$264
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$474k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CANADIAN FEED THE CHILDRENC$408
CAMH FOUNDATIONC$324
ST. MICHAELS FOUNDATIONC$264
KAYLA'S CHILDREN CENTREC$250
WORLD ANIMAL PROTECTIONC$240
THE CHURCH OF ST. MARY MAGDALENEC$180
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$11k · 6 repeat orgsC$1k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
5

Total granted

C$11k
C$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+125%

Still filing today

83%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$180 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CAMH FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$3k · revenue +12%
  • SF
    ST.MICHAELS FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$2k · revenue +25%
  • KC
    KAYLA'S CHILDREN CENTRE
    2× · 2019–2024 · C$550 · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • BB
    B'NAI BRITH CANADAgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$460 · revenue +147%
  • CM
    Canadian Mental Health Associationgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$200 · revenue +125%
  • TT
    THE TERRY FOX FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$180 · revenue +39%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Chaim Yosef and Chana Zeifman Charitable Trust

Funding other charities

—
2
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
3
Mazon Canada

The charity raises money primarily from the jeiwsh community and distributes grants to front line organizations that fight hunger

—
4
Abraham Kahn

The charity maintained an educational program to assist students in enhancing their knowledge and expertise in various areas pertaining to judaic studies.

—
5
The Dov Zimmerman Z'l Foundation

To make donations to charitable organizations

—
6
The Haichel Hatorah B'zion Foundation

The charity collected funds from the public for the purpose of providing scholarships for deserving students attending haichel hatorah b'zion institutions.

—
7
The Chabad Rehovot Fund
—
8
Maasim Tovim Foundation

To provide funds to registered charities

—
9
Bobever Yeshiva Bnei Zion Charitable Fund
—
10
Keren Hatorah Charity Fund

To engage in charitable activities as follows: the furtherance of education and to provide gifts to other charitable organizations and the advancement of religion.

—
11
Mifal Klita

Promoted the advancement of jewish heritage culture and jewish education particularily among the underpriveledged and needy children. establish and maintain and to aid in the establishment and maintennace of schools and classes providing…

—
12
The Shrage Zimmerman Memorial Fund

The foundation donates funds to charitable religious organisations and educational institutions.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is B'nai Brith of Canada Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Church of St Mary Magdalene. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCANADIAN FEED THE CHILDREN — C$3,140 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCAMH FOUNDATION — C$2,592 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetST.MICHAELS FOUNDATION — C$2,112 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD ANIMAL PROTECTION — C$1,920 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetKAYLA'S CHILDREN CENTRE — C$550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetB'NAI BRITH CANADA — C$460 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCanadian Mental Health Association — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHURCH OF ST. MARY MAGDALENE — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TERRY FOX FOUNDATION — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBeth Oloth Charitable Organization — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
United Way of Greater TorontoON5.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under judaism.

Source object 851370213:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Shaarei Tzedec Congregation’s filings →