Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

North York, ON · Charitable organization

Shaar Shalom Synagogue

Foster religiouys observance Maintain and conduct education programmes for religious instruction Support religious worship Maintain burial grounds

C$530k
Granted FY2021
31
Grants FY2021
1
Regions reached
C$94k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2021 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under C$10k22 grants · C$74k
  • C$10k–50k4 grants · C$129k
  • C$50k–250k5 grants · C$327k
C$4,418
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BETH EMETH BAIS YEHUDAC$93,668
PRIDE OF ISRAELC$67,158
KEHILLAT CHAVERIMC$58,322
BETH TIKVAHC$57,438
BEIT RAYIMC$50,369
BETH DAVIDC$44,183
ADATH ISRAEL CONGREGATIONC$42,416
BETH TORAHC$22,975
TEMPLE HAR ZIONC$19,440
CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF MARKHAMC$9,720
THE SONG SHULC$7,069
TEMPLE KOLK AMIC$6,185
TEMPLE SINAIC$6,185
PETAH TIKVAHC$5,302
BETH SHOLOMC$5,302
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$6.7M · 30 repeat orgsC$174k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against -20% for the ones you funded once.

30 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2021, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
7

Total granted

C$6.7M
C$151k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
-20%

Still filing today

97%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • BT
    BETH TIKVAH
    2× · 2018–2021 · C$715k · revenue +24%
  • BR
    BEIT RAYIM
    2× · 2018–2021 · C$578k · revenue +1% · 37% of their budget
  • AI
    ADATH ISRAEL CONGREGATIN
    3× · 2017–2021 · C$571k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SONG SHUL
    one grant, 2018 · C$146k · revenue +12%
  • AT
    Act to End Violence Against Women
    one grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue -71%
  • UC
    United Chesed
    one grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue +3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shaare Zedek Congregation

Religious and cultural activities as performed by a synagogue

—
2
Tsohar

Operating a synagogue and place of worship & religious study

—
3
Ahavas Isaac Synagogue

Provide services for the jewish religion & jewish celebrations

—
4
Congregation Beth Hamidrash

Synagogue providindaily religious services classes lectures and youth programs

—
5
Kolel Mareh Yechkel Congregation

To carry on a synagogue and enhance religious awareness

—
6
Temple B'nai Tikvah

Religious and educational services - jewish faith

—
7
Congregation Shir Chadash Inc

Operation of a jewish synagogue.

—
8
Shomrim Laboker Beth Yehudah Congregation & Affiliated Congregation Shaare Tefilah

Operate as a place of worship and learning center in the jewish community.

—
9
Congregation Tiferes Yaakov

Maintain a synagogue for prayer and worship according to the practice of orthodox judaism.

—
10
Congregation Gate David of Bobov

Synagogue and religious services

—
11
Congregation Beth Haminyan

Provides religious services and related activities for its members.

—
12
Congregation Shoavei Mayim

The congregation conducts daily orthodox jewish prayer services which include morning and evening services. the congregation also conducts community lectures in religious laws and in biblical talmudic studies

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Beth Sholom Synagogue and the most unlike its peers is Act to End Violence Against Women. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/42
Grantees still filing
29/42
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBETH EMETH BAIS YEHUDA — C$1,238,783 over 2y, 21% of budgetPRIDE OF ISRAEL — C$956,058 over 3y, 59% of budgetKEHILLAT CHAVERIM — C$759,532 over 3y, 98% of budgetBETH TIKVAH — C$714,813 over 2y, 22% of budgetBEIT RAYIM — C$577,544 over 2y, 37% of budgetADATH ISRAEL CONGREGATIN — C$571,416 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetBETH DAVID — C$506,933 over 2y, 16% of budgetBETH TORAH — C$263,125 over 2y, 11% of budgetTEMPLE HAR ZION — C$260,490 over 3y, 11% of budgetTHE SONG SHUL — C$146,420 over 1y, 21% of budgetCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF MARKHAM — C$117,525 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetTEMPLE SINAI — C$79,610 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetNESHAMAH CONGREGATION OF YORK — C$76,425 over 2y, 15% of budgetPETAH TIKVA-ANSHE CASTILLA CONGREGATION — C$69,952 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetBETH SHOLOM — C$60,952 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSHAARIE-BETH EL OF OAKVILLE — C$57,293 over 3y, 7.9% of budgetTEMPLE EMANU-EL — C$50,634 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetFOREST HILL JEWISH CENTRE — C$45,185 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHAAREI SHOMAYIM — C$44,634 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCHABAD FLAMINGO — C$44,634 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBETH RADOM — C$38,634 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetDANFORTH JEWISH CIRCLE — C$25,317 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetSHOMRAI SHABBOS — C$25,317 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetFIRST NARAYVER — C$25,317 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF RICHMOND HILL — C$25,317 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetBETH AVRAHAM YOSEPH — C$25,317 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetAM SHALOM — C$19,317 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetKNESSET ISRAEL — C$12,658 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetLODZER CENTRE — C$9,658 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetBETH TZEDEC — C$9,658 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHORNHILL WOODS SHUL — C$9,658 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetTEMPLE KOLK AMI — C$6,185 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAct to End Violence Against Women — C$1,027 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUnited Chesed — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDani Developing — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVe'ahavta — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCanadian Foundation for Masorti Judaism — C$518 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Jewish Appeal …Jewish Foundation of …The Benjamin Foundati…The Joseph Lebovic Ch…Zichron Binyomin Char…The Dr. Wolf Lebovic …Rayjo Charitable TrustBeth Tzedec Congregat…The Beverley and Samu…The Friedberg Charita…The Gra Charitable Tr…The Estaron Foundation
United Jewish Appeal of Greater TorontoON31.1× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Jewish Appeal of Greater Toronto · Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto · The Benjamin Foundation · The Joseph Lebovic Charitable Foundation · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · The Dr. Wolf Lebovic Charitable Foundation · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Beth Tzedec Congregation · The Beverley and Samuel H. Cohen Family Foundation · The Friedberg Charitable Foundation · The Gra Charitable Trust · The Estaron Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2021-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2021. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under judaism.

Source object 130353295:2021-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Shaar Shalom Synagogue’s filings →