Fredericton, NB · Charitable organization
Sgoolai Israel Synogogue Inc.
Conduct regular religious services weekly & on religious holidays.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BLUE SEA FOUNDATION | C$325 |
| JEWISH NATIONAL FUND OF CANADA INC. | C$90 |
| FREDERICTON COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC. | C$50 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$375 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK6× · 2017–2022 · C$3k · revenue +13%
- BHBEIT HALOCHEM CANADA4× · 2017–2021 · C$2k · revenue +84%
- CFCANADIAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIN4× · 2017–2021 · C$2k · revenue +70%
Funded once
- CMCANADIAN MAGEN DAVID ADOMone grant, 2021 · C$937
- CCCAPITAL COMMUNITY CHURCH INC.one grant, 2022 · C$400 · revenue +23%
- CMCANADIAN MAGEN DAVID ADOM FOR ISRAELone grant, 2017 · C$310
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The canadian friends of the hebrew university (cfhu) provided funding to the hebrew university of jerusalem which is a registered foreign university and a qualified donee to carry out post secondary educational & research activities as…
The mission of the Israel Magen Fund of Canada is to identify and support projects for qualified institutions in Israel and globally that require humanitarian aid medical assistance and physical and mental health care.
To provide scholarships to needy students to allow them to study at mosdos beer yitzchak in israel.
Raises funds for the jerusalem college of technology a school applied science.
The chairty makes gifts to qualified donees.
Scholarships granted to qualified applicants related to post-graduate studies
From our offices in montreal and toronto canadian friends of tel aviv university (cftau) organizes events and activities from coast to coast with an for a alumni past attendees and friends of tel aviv university (tau) and provide direct…
To assist and supply needy jewish residents in Israel and/or deserving students
The organization runs a variety of programming benefiting children and families within israel who are at risk of food or socioeconomic vulnerability.
The charity's primary purpose is to conduct social welfare programs in canada and israel. for the most part these programs include resettlement of new immigrants student scholarships community rehabilitation projects services for the needy…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canadian Friends of Yad Sarah and the most unlike its peers is St. Thomas University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH ↗
- Who funds BEIT HALOCHEM CANADA ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIN ↗
- Who funds NA'AMAT CANADA INC. ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN ZIONIST CULTURE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds SAINT THOMAS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL COMMUNITY CHURCH INC. ↗
- Who funds BLUE SEA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FREDERICTON COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC. ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way of Greater Toronto · My Tribute Gift Foundation · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.