Skip to content
Canadian charities

Toronto, ON · Private foundation

Seth Foundation for Health and Human Welfare

To raise fund and distribute to other charities and not-for-profit organizations that are focused around health and welfare

C$12k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k2 grants · C$2k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
C$1,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$85k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CANADIAN NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR THE BLINDC$10,000
SAI DHAM FOOD BANKC$1,000
THE CANADIAN FOUNDATION FOR PHYSICALLY DISABLED PERSONSC$500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$53k · 4 repeat orgsC$14k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

C$53k
C$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+35%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • C
    CNIB
    4× · 2018–2024 · C$41k · revenue +9%
  • SD
    SAI DHAM FOOD BANK
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$7k · revenue +49%
  • GS
    GOOD SHEPHERD REFUGE SOCIAL MINISTRIES
    3× · 2019–2021 · C$4k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • VO
    VOICE OF THE VEDAS CULTURAL SABHA INC.graduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$10k · revenue +35%
  • CC
    CIF CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$2k · revenue +103%
  • PC
    PHILIPPINE CANADIAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · C$500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
7/7
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCNIB — C$41,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVOICE OF THE VEDAS CULTURAL SABHA INC. — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSAI DHAM FOOD BANK — C$7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD REFUGE SOCIAL MINISTRIES — C$4,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCIF CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — C$2,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetTHE CANADIAN FOUNDATION FOR PHYSICALLY DISABLED PERSONS — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PRINCESS MARGARET FOUNDATION (RIDE TO CONQUER CANCER) — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…
PayPal Giving Fund CanadaON3.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 848038519:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Seth Foundation for Health and Human Welfare’s filings →