Skip to content

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Service régional d'admission du Montréal Métropolitain

Maintenir un service régional des admissions dans les établissements d'enseignement collégials membres.

C$250k
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$8k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$8,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FONDATION DU CEGEP À TERREBONNEC$8,000
FONDATION COLLÈGE BOIS-DE-BOULOGNEC$8,000
FONDATION CÉGEP DE SHERBROOKEC$8,000
HERITAGE COLLEGE FOUNDATIONC$8,000
FONDATION DE L'ITHQC$8,000
FONDATION COLLÈGE VANIERC$8,000
FONDATION COLLÈGE DE SHAWINIGANC$8,000
FONDATION COLLÈGE MONTMORENCYC$8,000
FONDATION CÉGEP ANDRÉ-LAURENDEAUC$8,000
FONDATION COLLÈGE LIONEL -GROULXC$8,000
FONDATION COLLÈGE GÉRALD-GODINC$8,000
FONDATION COLLÈGE DE VALLEYFIELDC$8,000
FONDATION COLLÈGE DE ROSEMONTC$8,000
FONDATION COLLÈGE DE MAISONNEUVEC$8,000
FONDATION COLLÈGE AHUNTSICC$8,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$488k · 31 repeat orgsC$28k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +114% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
3

Total granted

C$488k
C$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+114%
+29%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$13k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FONDATION CÉGEP ST-LAURENT
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$22k · revenue +45%
  • FC
    FONDATION CÉGEP ST-JEAN-SUR-RICHELIEU
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$16k · revenue +143%
  • FC
    FONDATION COLLÈGE AHUNTSIC
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$16k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • FÉ
    FONDATION ÉDOUARD BROCHU DE I'ITA DE ST-HYACINTHEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$5k · revenue +233% · 31% of their budget
  • FC
    FONDATION CÉGEP DE JOLIETTE
    one grant, 2022 · C$5k · revenue 0%
  • FS
    FONDATION SPORT-ÉTUDESgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$5k · revenue +29%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Fondation du Cégep de Sainte-Foy

Financement de bourses remises à des étudiants. financement d'investissement afin de favoriser la recherche et le développement éducatif. coopération internationale et formation interculturelle dans le but de favoriser la tenue de stages…

—
2
La Fondation de l'Université Laval
—
3
Fondation ÉCole De La Baie St-FranÇOis

Bourses d'étude fond de dépannage pour les étdiantes financement des projets soumis par les professeurs pour la persévérance

—
4
Fondation Du Cegep De La Pocatiere

Verser des bourses aux étudiants du cégep de la pocatière.

—
5
Fondation du Cégep de Limoilou

La mission de la fondation est d'aider directement ou indirectement des étudiants (es) à réussir leurs études et à s'épanouir selon leur potentiel leurs aptitudes et leurs aspirations.

—
6
Fondation Université du Québec

Octroi de bourses et financement de projets de recherche ou de développement pour les institutions universitaires.

—
7
Fondation de l'Université du Québec à Montréal

La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal

—
8
La Fondation Du CÉGep De Rimouski

Dons au cégep de rimouski pour des bourses aux étudiants et pour le développement de la clientèle étudiante

—
9
Fondation Hec Montréal

Financement de plusieurs projets de recherche reliés à la gestion de hec montréal et contributions à des programmes de bourses à hec montréal

—
10
Fondation du Collège François-de-Laval

Assistance financière au collège françois-de-laval pour le financement de projets spéciaux comme la rénovation des locaux le renouvellement du parc informatique et la mise à niveau des équipements sportifs

—
11
Le Fond De Developpement Du College Jean-De-Brebeuf
—
12
Fondation de l'Ita Campus de La Pocatière

La fondation remet des bourses d'études de perfectionnement ainsi que des bourses pour la recherche et le développement

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Fondation du Cégep de l'Abitibi-Témiscamingue and the most unlike its peers is L'institution Royale Pour L'avancement Des Sciences / Royal Institution for the Advancement of Learning. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
31/35
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFONDATION CÉGEP ST-LAURENT — C$22,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetFONDATION CÉGEP ST-JEAN-SUR-RICHELIEU — C$16,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetFONDATION CHAMPLAIN-LENNOXVILLE — C$16,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetFONDATION COLLÈGE AHUNTSIC — C$16,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetFONDATION COLLÈGE BOIS-DE-BOULOGNE — C$16,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetFONDATION CÉGEP MARIE-VICTORIN — C$16,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetFONDAITON CÉGEP ÉDOUARD-MONTPETIT — C$16,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFONDATION CÉGEP ABITIBI-TÉMISCAMINGUE — C$16,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetFONDATION COLLÈGE MONTMORENCY — C$16,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetFONDATION CÉGEP SAINT-JÉRÔME — C$16,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFONDATION COLLÈGE LIONEL -GROULX — C$16,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetFONDATION DE L'ITHQ — C$16,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFONDATION CÉGEP ANDRÉ-LAURENDEAU — C$16,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetFONDATION CÉGEP ST-HYACINTHE — C$16,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetFONDATION COLLÈGE DE VALLEYFIELD — C$16,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetFONDATION COLLÈGE DE ROSEMONT — C$16,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetFONDATION CÉGEP VIEUX-MONTRÉAL — C$16,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetFONDATION COLLÈGE DE SHAWINIGAN — C$16,000 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetFONDATION CÉGEP DE SHERBROOKE — C$16,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetFONDATION CÉGEP SOREL-TRACY — C$16,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetFONDATION COLLÈGE DE MAISONNEUVE — C$16,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetFONDATION CÉGEP DE L'OUTAOUAIS — C$16,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFONDATION COLLÈGE VANIER — C$16,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetHERITAGE COLLEGE FOUNDATION — C$16,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetFONDATION CÉGEP JOHN ABBOTT COLLÈGE — C$16,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetFONDATION CÉGEP DE GRANBY-HAUTE-YAMASKA — C$16,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetFONDATION CÉGEP DE TROIS-RIVIÉRES — C$16,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetFONDATION COLLÈGE GÉRALD-GODIN — C$16,000 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetFONDATION CÉGEP DE DRUMMONDVILLE — C$16,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetROYAL INSTITUTION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION CÉGEP RÉGIONAL DE LANAUDIÈRE — C$8,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFONDATION ÉDOUARD BROCHU DE I'ITA DE ST-HYACINTHE — C$5,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetFONDATION SPORT-ÉTUDES — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fondation Des Comptables Professionnels Agréés Du QuébecQC12.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fondation Des Comptables Professionnels Agréés Du Québec · École de Technologie Supérieure · Hewitt Foundation · Fondation Famille Godin - Godin Family Foundation · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Conam Charitable Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of schools and education.

Source object 861754935:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Service régional d'admission du Montréal Métropolitain’s filings →