Skip to content

Toronto, ON · Private foundation

Sears Employees Charitable Fund

Contribution through payroll deductions and miscellaneous fundraising used to support registered Canadian charities.

C$298k
Granted FY2017
6
Grants FY2017
1
Regions reached
C$267k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2017 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under C$10k4 grants · C$9k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$22k
  • C$250k+1 grant · C$267k
C$2,540
Median grant
1
Regions reached
—
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Sears Canada Charitable FoundationC$267,135
United Way of QuinteC$22,032
Belleville General Hospital FoundationC$2,540
Qunite Children's FoundationC$2,032
Hospice QuinteC$2,032
Three Oaks FoundatonC$2,032
02Your field
02the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSears Canada Charitable Foundation — C$267,135 over 1y, 51% of budgetUnited Way of Quinte — C$22,032 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBelleville General Hospital Foundation — C$2,540 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetQunite Children's Foundation — C$2,032 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHospice Quinte — C$2,032 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThree Oaks Foundaton — C$2,032 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rotary Club of Belleville Charitable TrustON9.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rotary Club of Belleville Charitable Trust · St. Mark's United Church Cannifton · Senators Community Foundation / Fondation communautaire des Senateurs · Ottawa Gatineau Youth Foundation la Fondation Jeunesse D'Ottawa Gatineau · John M. & Bernice Parrott Foundation Inc. · Hydro One Employees' and Pensioners' Charity Trust Fund · BenefAction Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · My Tribute Gift Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way of Greater Toronto

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2017-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2017. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation.

Source object 888957842:2017-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Sears Employees’ filings →