Skip to content

White Lake, ON · Private foundation

Scharf Family Charitable Trust

The trust is obligated to donate a minimum of its earnings to charities.

C$310k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$155k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • C$10k–50k4 grants · C$105k
  • C$50k–250k2 grants · C$205k
C$40,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHARF FAMILY CHARITABLE TRUSTC$155,000
ALMONTE GENERAL HOSPITALC$50,000
ARNPRIOR PUBLIC LIBRARYC$40,000
UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTAC$35,000
CAMP BANTINGC$15,000
FARLEY FOUNDATIONC$15,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$2.2M · 6 repeat orgsC$126k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +403% since the first grant, against +70% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

C$2.2M
C$126k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+403%
+70%

Still filing today

100%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SCHARF FAMILY CHARITABLE TRUST
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$1.1M · revenue +198%
  • AG
    ALMONTE GENERAL HOSPITAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$555k · revenue +403%
  • AP
    ARNPRIOR PUBLIC LIBRARY
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$250k · revenue ×15 · 74% of their budget

Funded once

  • CB
    CAMP BANTING
    one grant, 2021 · C$40k
  • CH
    C H E O FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$25k · revenue +70%
  • AP
    ARNPRIOR PARACLETE MINISTRIESgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$20k · revenue +44%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arnprior Regional Health Foundation

Arnprior regional health foundation raised funds in support of arnprior regional health. during the 2023-24 fiscal year the foundation flowed funds in the amount of (f/s 1 169 942 + 55 000)

—
2
Alberta Diabetes Foundation

Funding of diabetes research

—
3
Peterborough Regional Health Centre Foundation

The Peterborough Regional Health Centre Foundation raises funds and manages donor gifts for the purpose of supporting outstanding patient care at the Peterborough Regional Health Centre. This includes raising funds for identified capital…

—
4
Cold Lake Regional Hospital Foundation

Grants for the purchase of equipment and furnishings to enhance the care and services provided by the Cold Lake Health Care Centre

—
5
Lac La Biche Regional Health Foundation

Support and contribute to the acquisition of health care equipment in lac la biche alberta

—
6
Brant Community Healthcare System Foundation

Fund raised are for designated and capital projects and patient equipment for the brant community healthcare system brantford general hospital and the willett hospital sites

—
7
Kootenay Lake Hospital Foundation

Kootenay lake hospital foundation raises funds to purchase priority medical equipment for the kootenay lake hospital

—
8
Bruce Peninsula Hospitals Foundation

Raised funds by operating an auction mail soliciations and other events. received donations from businesses and individuals. funds were donated to grey bruce health services for the purchase of medical equipment capital improvements and…

—
9
Port Perry Hospital Foundation

Conduct fundraising for donations to support the equipment program and capital needs of Lakeridge Health Port Perry and healthcare-related programs and services carried out in or otherwise benefiting the catchment area served by the Port…

—
10
The Ottawa Hospital Foundation

The ottawa hospital foundation raises and grants funds to the ottawa hospital foundation and the ottawa hospital research institute and other qaulified donees for the purposes of improving patient care capital dvelopment medical research…

—
11
Ajax Pickering Hospital Foundation

To primarily raise funds to support the capital equipment and patient care needs of Lakeridge Health Ajax/Pickering site

—
12
Lillian Fraser Memorial Hospital Foundation

To provide support for the purchase of equipment and materials for the north shore area and lillian fraser memorial hospital.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Foundation / La Fondation De L'hÔPital Pour Enfants De L'est De L'ontario and the most unlike its peers is The Governors of the University of Alberta. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetALMONTE GENERAL HOSPITAL — C$555,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetARNPRIOR PUBLIC LIBRARY — C$250,000 over 7y, 74% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA — C$215,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCAMP BANTING — C$95,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetFARLEY FOUNDATION — C$55,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetC H E O FOUNDATION — C$25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARNPRIOR PARACLETE MINISTRIES — C$20,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetST JOHNS ANGLICAN CHURCH — C$10,000 over 1y, 92% of budgetPRIOR HESTNUTS — C$10,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetDARLING WHITE LAKE CENTER — C$8,000 over 1y, 96% of budgetOUR LADY OF GRACE PARISH — C$8,000 over 1y, 14% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Strategic Charitable Giving FoundationON5.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · My Tribute Gift Foundation · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 787247725:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Scharf Family’s filings →