Skip to content

Sceptre, SK · Charitable organization

Sceptre United Church

We contribute to various programs and charities.

C$38k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k7 grants · C$28k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
C$5,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$647k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mission & Service Fund of United Church of CanadaC$10,000
Saint Andrews CollegeC$7,500
Regina & District Food BankC$6,000
Swift Current Food BankC$5,000
Saskatchewan Red CrossC$4,000
Southwest Crisis ServicesC$3,500
Kindersley & District Food BankC$1,500
LSC Food Bank CorporationC$500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$294k · 13 repeat orgsC$177k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
19

Total granted

C$294k
C$173k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+34%

Still filing today

62%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    United Church of Canada
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$78k · revenue +22%
  • RF
    Regina Food Bank
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$26k · revenue +66%
  • SC
    Southwest Crisis Centre
    5× · 2017–2022 · C$24k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · C$100k
  • SA
    Stars Air Ambulancegraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$10k · revenue +45%
  • SM
    SCEPTRE MEMORIAL GARDENS
    one grant, 2018 · C$9k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saskatoon Regional Health Authority

We operate a health delivery system providing a full range of health care services to residents of the Saskatoon Health Region and other residents of Saskatchewan. Services are provided in hospitals, long-term care facilities, primary…

—
2
Saskatchewan Health Authority

The Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) is responsible for the delivery of high quality and timely health care for all the people across the province. The SHA has approximately 40 000 employees and 2 770 physicians who provide services to…

—
3
United Way of Saskatoon and Area

United Way mission is to improve lives and build community by engaging individuals and mobilizing collective action. United Way invests resources into programs services and community building activities that have an emphasis on addressing…

—
4
Saskatoon Interval House Inc.

The charity provides emergency shelter to abused women and their children who are in need of safe accommodation. the charity also provides counselling services and child care services.

—
5
United Church of Canada South Saskatchewan Hospital Chaplaincy

South Saskatchewan Hospital Chaplaincy is a community ministry within the United Church of Canada - promotes the spiritual well-being of holistic health care for out of town and emergency patients and families primarily of the United…

—
6
Saskatchewan Heart Centre Inc.
—
7
University of Saskatchewan

The University of Saskatchewan's primary role is to provide post-secondary instruction and research in humanities sciences and other areas of human intellectual cultural social and physical development. The University offers instructional…

—
8
Samaritan Place Corp.

The entity provides holistic health care and palliative care to residents in need in the province of saskatchewan through the operation of two health care facilities known as samaritan place and the hospice at glengarda.

—
9
Saskatoon Convalescent Home

The organization owns and operates a special care home for the aged. the home provides care for the aged. the home provides care to individuals who require assistance to meet their physical mental social and/or spiritual needs. in doing so…

—
10
Prairie Hospice Society Inc

Establish and run a community hospice care program in saskatoon

—
11
South Country Health Care Foundation Inc

South country health care foundation raises money through donations and fund raising and subsequently grants funds to various capital projects in the south country area of saskatchewan on basis of needs.

—
12
Food Banks of Saskatchewan Corporation

Acquire food and consumer products by donation or otherwise for distribution to agencies serving the hungry and for distribution to member food banks. receive and distribute to member food banks donations and gifts of any kind made for the…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ywca Saskatoon Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Leader United Church. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUnited Church of Canada — C$77,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSt. Andrew's College — C$52,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetRegina Food Bank — C$26,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSouthwest Crisis Centre — C$24,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetSaskatchewan Red Cross — C$14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYWCA — C$12,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetStars Air Ambulance — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLeader & District Food Bank — C$6,000 over 5y, 23% of budgetMaple Creek and District Opportunities — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRonald McDonald House — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHabitat For Humanity — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCamp Shagabec — C$5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetLeader United Church — C$3,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetJim Pattison Foundation — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWSCH Auxiliary — C$1,500 over 3y, 9.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds United Church of Canada ↗
  • Who funds St. Andrew's College ↗
  • Who funds Regina Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds Southwest Crisis Centre ↗
  • Who funds Saskatchewan Red Cross ↗
  • Who funds YWCA ↗
  • Who funds Stars Air Ambulance ↗
  • Who funds Leader & District Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds Maple Creek and District Opportunities ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House ↗
  • Who funds Habitat For Humanity ↗
  • Who funds Camp Shagabec ↗
  • Who funds Leader United Church ↗
  • Who funds Sceptre Memorial Gardens ↗
  • Who funds Jim Pattison Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WSCH Auxiliary ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Strategic Charitable Giving FoundationON5.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · BenefAction Foundation · United Way of Greater Toronto · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 119142529:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Sceptre United Church’s filings →