Armena, AB · Charitable organization
Scandia Lutheran Church
1.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SYNOD OF ALBERTA + THE TERRITORIES ELCIC | C$6,900 |
| CAMROSE HELPS | C$570 |
| HASTINGS LAKE BIBLE CAMP | C$400 |
| NEIHBOR-AID FOOD BANK | C$400 |
| GRAINS FOR THE HUNGARY | C$400 |
| AUGUSTANA CAMPUS MINISTRIES (CHAPLAINCY) | C$400 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$970 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SOSYNOD OF ALBERTA AND THE TERRITORIES6× · 2017–2024 · C$38k · revenue +10%
- NBNEIGHBOR-AID/FOOD BANK2× · 2018–2019 · C$3k · revenue +124%
- NFNEIGHBOR-AID / FOOD BANK4× · 2019–2024 · C$2k · revenue +115%
Funded once
- SOSYNOD OF ALBERTA & THE TERRITORIESone grant, 2023 · C$7k
- NFNEIGHBOR-AID FOOD BANKone grant, 2022 · C$1k
- NONEIGHBOR-AID OR THE FOOD BANKone grant, 2017 · C$1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.