Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Thornhill, ON · Private foundation

Sayal Charitable Foundation

To receive and maintain a fund to apply from time to time all or part thereof and the income therefrom for charitable purposes towards providing welfare for the poor and needy medical help for sick educational funds to the disadvantaged financial assistance to religious institutions and to assist in the furtherance and promotion…

C$12k
Granted FY2020
9
Grants FY2020
1
Regions reached
C$3k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2020 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$1,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOCHASANWASI SHRI AKSHAR PURUSHOTTAM SWAMINARAYAN SANSTHA INC$3,004
ARYA SAMAJ MARKHAMC$3,000
THE TERRY FOX FOUNDATIONC$2,000
ISKCON TORONTOC$1,000
BOCHASANWASI SHRI AKSHAR PURUSHOTTAM SWAMINARAYAN SANSTHA CHC$1,000
THE SALVATION ARYMC$500
SUNNYBROOK HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE FOUNDAITONC$500
MARKHAM STOUFFVILLE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONC$500
MACKENZIE HEALTH FOUNDATIONC$500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$81k · 13 repeat orgsC$14k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2020, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
8

Total granted

C$81k
C$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+9%

Still filing today

92%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    ARYA SAMAJ MARKHAM
    4× · 2017–2020 · C$22k · revenue +58%
  • TT
    THE TERRY FOX FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · C$12k · revenue +39%
  • IT
    ISKCON Toronto
    4× · 2017–2020 · C$11k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • GT
    GURUVAYURAPPAN TERMICE OF BRAMPTONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$2k · revenue +28%
  • DD
    DIVYA DURGA JYOTI
    one grant, 2019 · C$2k · revenue -82%
  • MH
    Mackenzie Health Volunteer Association
    one grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue -50%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Asian Long Term Care Foundation

Continuing fundraising to build long term care facility for seniors.

—
2
Vidya School Foundation

Working in the fund raising mode to sponsor projects in Canada and India.

—
3
S.G.L. Charitable Society

Society raise funds to donate to charitable hospitals in india and health education societies in india

—
4
The Nargis Dutt Cancer Foundation

Provide medical equipment and related supplies to hospital and medical centres in india

—
5
Brahmananda Saraswati Foundation of Canada

The charity operates a vedic school projects in bhopal india through its contracted agent the maharishi ved vigyan vishwa vidyapeetham charitable trust. students between the ages of 14 and 25 live and study on campus receiving traditional…

—
6
The Gupta Family Foundation

To promote the advancement of education of children and adults by literacy programs learning of languages including indian languages and to promote higher achievement in learning by providing special prizes scholarships and awards - to…

—
7
Uhn Foundation

We raise fund for research education and the enhancement of patient care at Toronto General and Western hospitals as well as Toronto Rehabilitation Institute and Michener Institute of Education at UHN. Together with our donors we are…

—
8
Sunnybrook Research Institute

Sunnybrook Research Institute (SRI) is the research arm of Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center (SHSC) a teaching hospital fully affiliated with the University of Toronto. The vision of SRI is to invent the future of health care. Our main…

—
9
Hamilton Health Sciences Foundation

Raise manage and distribute funds in support of our hospitals and cancer centre for patient care research education equipment renovations and capital expenditures.

—
10
Fondation Sopar-Bala Vikasa

Appuis financier aux projets d'organismes de charité enregistrés canadiens et indiens qui oeuvrent au mieux- être des plus démunis de l'inde et plus particulièrement sopar- bala vikasa.

—
11
Radha Madhav Society

Programs to promote spiritual advancement based on Hindu faith. Grants to organizations that support health care for women and education for girls.

—
12
Mahakali Mandir Canada Society
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bochasanwasi Shri Akshar Purushottam Swaminarayan Sanstha Charities Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Sansar Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetARYA SAMAJ MARKHAM — C$22,100 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetTHE TERRY FOX FOUNDATION — C$12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetISKCON Toronto — C$10,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCANADIAN MUSEUM OF INDIAN CIVILIZATION INC — C$9,340 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSANSAR FOUNDATION — C$6,500 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetSICK CHILDRENS HOSPITAL — C$5,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetNORTH YORK GENERAL FOUNDATION — C$3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOCHASANWASI SHRI AKSHAR PURUSHOTTAM SWAMINARAYAN SANSTHA IN — C$3,004 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRINCESS MARGARET CANCER FOUNDATION — C$3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGURUVAYURAPPAN TERMICE OF BRAMPTON — C$2,100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Salvation Army — C$2,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetVOICE OF THE VEDAS CULTURAL SABHA INC — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDIVYA DURGA JYOTI — C$2,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSUNNYBROOK FOUNDATION — C$1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMarkham Stouffville Hospital Foundation — C$1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMackenzie Health Volunteer Association — C$1,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAI SEWA CANADA — C$1,100 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetSick Kids Foundation — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLAUCOMA RESEARCH SOCIETY OF CANADA — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSouthlake Regional Health Centre Foundation — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOCHASANWASI SHRI AKSHAR PURUSHOTTAM SWAMINARAYAN SANSTHA CH — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSHINING THROUGH CENTRES — C$750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMACKENZIE HEALTH FOUNDATION — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCNIB — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Private Giving Founda…Charities Aid Foundat…Toronto FoundationStrategic Charitable …United Way of Greater…BenefAction FoundationUnited Way East Ontar…CHIMP: Charitable Imp…Charitable Gift Funds…My Tribute Gift Found…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…
Private Giving FoundationON8.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Private Giving Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · Toronto Foundation · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · United Way of Greater Toronto · BenefAction Foundation · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · My Tribute Gift Foundation · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2020-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2020. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 888268331:2020-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Sayal’s filings →