Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

White City, SK · Charitable organization

Saskatchewan Professional Fire Fighters Burn Fund

We purchase hospital equipment for burn units hyperbaric chambers provide funding for education and run public awareness and education campaigns.

C$23k
Granted FY2022
3
Grants FY2022
3
Regions reached
C$15k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2022 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under C$10k2 grants · C$8k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$15k
C$5,000
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$567k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOSPITALS OF REGINA FOUNDATION INCC$15,000
EDMONTON FIRE FIGHTERS BURN TREATMENT SOCIETYC$5,000
BRITISH COLUMBIA PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERSC$2,500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$176k · 4 repeat orgsC$20k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +95% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
1

Total granted

C$176k
C$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%
0%

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • RU
    Royal University Hospital Foundation Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$64k · revenue +95%
  • RQ
    Regina Qu'Appelle Health Region
    4× · 2017–2020 · C$59k · revenue +410%
  • EF
    Edmonton Fire Fighters Burn Treatment Society
    6× · 2017–2022 · C$30k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • FH
    Five Hills regional Health Authority
    one grant, 2018 · C$5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRoyal University Hospital Foundation Inc — C$64,499 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetRegina Qu'Appelle Health Region — C$59,404 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEdmonton Fire Fighters Burn Treatment Society — C$30,000 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetBritish Columbia Professional Fire Fighters — C$22,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHOSPITALS OF REGINA FOUNDATION INC — C$15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of the Alb…Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fo…My Tribute Gift Found…United Way of Greater…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
United Way of the Alberta Capital RegionAB7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of the Alberta Capital Region · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · My Tribute Gift Foundation · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2022-03-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2022. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under foundations.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 119140325:2022-03-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Saskatchewan Professional Fire Fighters Burn’s filings →