Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Regina, SK · Private foundation

Saskatchewan Pro-Life Association Educational Trust Foundation

Grants to qualified donees as finances allow from fundraising activitie

C$14k
Granted FY2023
11
Grants FY2023
1
Regions reached
C$3k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$630
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$39k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REGINA PRO-LIFE ASSOCIATION CORPORATIONC$3,250
WEYBURN & DISTRICT PRO LIFEC$3,150
WOOMB-CANADA INCC$3,000
ALLIANCE FOR LIFEC$1,270
BATTLEFORDS RIGHT TO LIFE CORPORATIONC$920
PASQUIA PRO LIFE GROUP INC.C$630
NATIONAL CAMPUS LIFE NETWORK (NCLN)C$499
PRO-LIFE ESTEVAN & AREA INCC$430
MACKLIN PRO-LIFE ASSOCIATIONC$430
UNITY LIFE ASSOCIATIONC$200
MEADOW LAKE PRO-LIFE ASSOCIATIONC$108
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$43k · 8 repeat orgsC$14k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of -2% since the first grant, against -15% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

C$43k
C$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
-15%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PASQUIA PRO-LIFE GROUP INC.
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$7k · revenue +36% · 50% of their budget
  • WI
    WOOMB-CANADA INC
    3× · 2018–2023 · C$7k · revenue +25% · 71% of their budget
  • CP
    CANADIAN PHYSICIANS FOR LIFE
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$4k · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • SP
    SASKATOON PREGNANCY OPTIONS CENTRE
    one grant, 2021 · C$6k
  • TS
    TEEN-AID SASKATOON
    one grant, 2018 · C$3k · revenue -37%
  • RT
    RIGHT TO LIFE ASSOCIATION OF TORONTO AND AREAgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$1k · revenue +87%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Right to Life Association of Thunder Bay and Area

Distribution of educational materials and raising public awareness of pro-life issues

—
2
Guelph and Area Right to Life Association

Support schools and general public with education ongoing support and education for expecting parents

—
3
Right to Life Association of Mississauga and Area

We conduct Educational and Speaking Events distribute newsletters and conduct Fund Raising through Memberships and Donations.

—
4
Hamilton Right to Life

Public education through advertising billboards radio ads mobile phone ads life chain march for life presentations by speakers videos exhibits coffee & dessert evenings fundraising dinner.

—
5
Lambton Right-to-Life

Education programs on the value of life programs for expectants and postpartum mothers in need

—
6
The Lindsay Right to Life Organization

Main purpose: to educate people on the sanctity of life from conception to natural death

—
7
Right to Life Association

Pregnant distress services - to advise and assist clients who are distressed about pregnancy and provide layettes for the needy. Helpline - to assist individuals with post abortion syndrome Public education and other study groups.…

—
8
Rossland-Trail Right to Life Society

Continued fetal development education for public. continued rental of hwy billboard 'adoption a loving option' (displayed message)

—
9
Kincardine & District Right to Life Group

Annual 'life chain' rally joint publicity with alliance for life ontario pink flag display

—
10
Edmonton Prolife Society

Our primary work is educational in nature. we prepare displays and material for public information via conferences conventions and billoards. from our office we prepare materials and publications to provide facts on life. guest speakers…

—
11
Brant Right to Life Charitable Trust

Pro life seminars seminars in secondary schools on pro life education annual meeting with speakers on pro life and end of life.

—
12
Choose Life Elgin

To educate and inform others of the sanctity of all human life from cconception to natural death. speak in schools upon request. provide educational materials to the public. make referrrals for women in crisis pregnancies where possible.…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Right to Life Association of Toronto and Area and the most unlike its peers is Teen-Aid Saskatoon Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
4/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBIRTHRIGHT REGINA INC — C$8,037 over 4y, 8.8% of budgetPASQUIA PRO-LIFE GROUP INC. — C$7,436 over 2y, 50% of budgetWOOMB-CANADA INC — C$7,000 over 3y, 71% of budgetBATTLEFORDS RIGHT TO LIFE CORPORATION — C$5,300 over 3y, 19% of budgetREGINA PRO-LIFE ASSOCIATION CORPORATION — C$4,800 over 2y, 11% of budgetCANADIAN PHYSICIANS FOR LIFE — C$4,150 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetWEYBURN & DISTRICT PRO LIFE — C$3,470 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetMACKIN/DENZIL PRO-LIFE ASSOCIATION — C$3,170 over 4y, 84% of budgetRIGHT TO LIFE ASSOCIATION OF TORONTO AND AREA — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMOOSEJAW RIGHT TO LIFE — C$1,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Canadahelps CanadonCanadian Online Givin…
Canadahelps CanadonON2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2023-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2023. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations advancing education.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 885750638:2023-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Saskatchewan Pro-Life Association Educational’s filings →