Skip to content

Saskatoon, SK · Public foundation

Saskatchewan Institute on Community Living Inc.

Providing funding to Inclusion Saskatchewan Inc.

C$429k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$420k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k3 grants · C$9k
  • C$250k+1 grant · C$420k
C$3,250
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$892k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Inclusion SaskatchewanC$420,000
Inclusion WeyburnC$3,250
Inclusion LloydminsterC$3,250
Saskatchewan Association for Community Living Outlook BranchC$2,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$3.8M · 8 repeat orgsC$20k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

C$3.8M
C$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
0%

Still filing today

75%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • IS
    Inclusion Saskatchewan Inc.
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$3.8M · revenue +20% · 26% of their budget
  • IL
    Inclusion Lloydminster
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$17k · revenue +25%
  • CL
    Community Living Association Saskatoon Inc.
    2× · 2019–2020 · C$14k · revenue +156%

Funded once

  • IR
    Inclusion Regina Association Inc.
    one grant, 2019 · C$11k · revenue 0%
  • CO
    Creative Options Reginagraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$5k · revenue +94%
  • PF
    People First of Canada
    one grant, 2023 · C$4k · revenue -18%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saskatchewan Institute On Community Living Inc.

Providing funding to Inclusion Saskatchewan Inc. whose mandate is to build and inspire an inclusive Saskatchewan by empowering and valuing people with intellectual disabilities. The vision of Inclusion Saskatchewan Inc. is that all people…

—
2
Inclusion Canada

Inclusion Canada is a national family based association assisting people with intellectual disabilities and their families to lead the way in advancing inclusion in their own lives and in their communities. This is done in Canada and…

—
3
Inclusion Alberta Society

To support persons with developmental disabilities and their families by supporting them to live in the community attend school and achieve meaningful employment provide training and workshops and support individuals to attend

—
4
Saskatchewan Alternative Initiatives Inc.

Saskatchewan alternative initiative (sai) offers daytime supports (vocational recreational and/or volunteer) home supports and semi- independent living programs. we provide choices and opportunities for people with intellecual…

—
5
Southwest Homes Inc

We provide residential and vocational support services to individuals with an intellectual disability in the Swift Current Community through our residential respite supported living and community connections programs.

—
6
Inclusion Yukon Society

Youth investment inclusive recreation ready willing and able disability services respite pathways fasdservices employment trainingservices.

—
7
Saskatchewan Voice of People With Disabilities Inc.
—
8
Inclusion Fredericton Inc.
—
9
Community Inclusions Ltd

Community inclusions provides supports to adults aged 18 - 65 with intellectual disabilities. these supports range from residential employment supportive and recreational.

—
10
Inclusion Winnipeg Inc.

Provided education community development service development consultation and technical assistance to clients and their families

—
11
Inclusion Alberta Foundation

Provide funding to inclusion alberta society a charity which supports children and adults with developmental disabilities and their families.

—
12
Spinal Cord Injury Saskatchewan Inc.

Peer support - mentor and role models to encourage and sustain clients through their challenges. rehabilitation counseling - professional counseling to assist individuals in their return to being more independent. case management - overall…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Living Association Saskatoon Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Inclusion Moose Jaw Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetInclusion Saskatchewan Inc. — C$3,771,703 over 7y, 26% of budgetInclusion Lloydminster — C$17,250 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetInclusion Moose Jaw — C$16,300 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetInclusion Weyburn — C$16,250 over 4y, 9.1% of budgetCommunity Living Association Saskatoon Inc. — C$14,400 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetInclusion Regina Association Inc. — C$11,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetCreative Options Regina — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPeople First of Canada — C$4,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSaskatchewan Association for Community Living Outlook Branch — C$3,397 over 2y, 39% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Inclusion Saskatchewan Inc.SK12.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Inclusion Saskatchewan Inc. · Saskatchewan Community Foundation Corp. · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-03-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 125870626:2024-03-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Saskatchewan Institute on Community Living’s filings →