Skip to content

Saskatoon, SK · Charitable organization

Saskatchewan Health Authority

The Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) is responsible for the delivery of high quality and timely health care for all the people across the province.

C$104M
Granted FY2024still arriving
59
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$20M
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 59 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • C$10k–50k5 grants · C$192k
  • C$50k–250k7 grants · C$1.1M
  • C$250k+47 grants · C$103M
C$714,126
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$2.6B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
M.D. Ambulance Care Ltd.C$19,637,787
Medavie Health Services WestC$18,409,565
Mont St Joseph Home Inc.C$10,644,135
Parkland Ambulance Care Ltd.C$5,320,426
Radville Marian Health CentreC$4,056,550
EHN Prairies Inc.C$2,992,115
WPD Ambulance Care (North Battleford)C$2,753,886
La Ronge Emergency Medical ServicesC$2,297,474
Pine Lodge Addiction Recovery Inc.C$2,269,729
Crestvue Ambulance Services Ltd.C$2,083,360
Shamrock Ambulance Care Inc.C$2,081,933
North East Emergency Medical ServicesC$2,081,863
Westmed Paramedics IncC$1,830,450
Individual grant recipientC$1,727,929
Individual grant recipientC$1,630,185
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 1% of grant dollars (C$1.2M). The 99% that went abroad (C$181M) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 99% of all-years giving (C$181M)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$136M · 42 repeat orgsC$46M to everyone else

42 repeat relationships — 42 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
20

Total granted

C$136M
C$14M

Still filing today

0%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$32M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    M.D. Ambulance Care Ltd.
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$36M
  • MS
    Mont St Joseph Home Inc.
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$20M
  • PA
    Parkland Ambulance Care Ltd.
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$9.3M

Funded once

  • PW
    POINTS WEST LIVING LLOYDMINSTER INC.
    one grant, 2023 · C$3.4M
  • LA
    LIFELINE AMBULANCE SERVICE INC. - MOOSE JAW EMS
    one grant, 2023 · C$2.8M
  • HA
    HUTCH AMBULANCE SERVICE INC.
    one grant, 2023 · C$1.5M

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field
03the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPONTEIX & DISTRICT ROAD AMBULANCE NON-PROFIT CORPORATION — C$268,930 over 1y, 92% of budgetGULL LAKE & DISTRICT AMBULANCE CORPORATION — C$239,252 over 1y, 51% of budgetFOYER ST. JOSEPH NURSING HOME INC. — C$213,499 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetVAL MARIE DISTRICT AMBULANCE — C$150,832 over 1y, 88% of budgetCANADIAN MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION — C$147,164 over 1y, 62% of budgetMCKERRACHER SUPPORT SERVICES INC. — C$142,155 over 1y, 89% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cypress Regional Health AuthoritySK10.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cypress Regional Health Authority · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-03-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under supportive health care.

Source object 895830180:2024-03-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Saskatchewan Health Authority’s filings →