Winnipeg, MB · Charitable organization
Sanctuary House of Prayer (Winnipeg) Inc.
We hold multiple worship / prayer meetings each week (in-person).
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CAREIMPACT INC. | C$1,000 |
| LIVING BIBLE EXPLORERS | C$1,000 |
| CANADIAN LIFELIGHT MINISTRIES | C$1,000 |
| JOURNEY CANADA | C$1,000 |
| CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTRE (FAMILY SUPPORT CENTRE) | C$1,000 |
| TEEN CHALLENGE OF CENTRAL CANADA INC. | C$1,000 |
| HOUSE OF HESED (MANITOBA) INC. | C$1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$4k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TCTEEN CHALLENGE OF CENTRAL CANADA INC.2× · 2018–2022 · C$2k · revenue +108%
- LBLIVING BIBLE EXPLORERS3× · 2017–2022 · C$2k · revenue -46%
- HOHOUSE OF HESED (MANITOBA) INC.2× · 2018–2022 · C$2k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- 2P24-7 PRAYER CANADAone grant, 2021 · C$700 · revenue -86%
- CECHRISTIANS EMPOWERING ORGANIZATIONS MINISTRIES INC/HEART OFgraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$500 · revenue +37%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Operate residential drug rehabilitation program for youth across canada print and distribute drug prevention literature provide counselling to parents and youth with addiction related problems
Ministering through personal and family counselling
A) to provide personnel and resources for christian organizations and ministries; and b) to provide training and materials to christian leaders and individuals involved in evanglism and christian ministry worldwide
At life's journey we strive to build on mentoring relationship to meet each person where they are at. we provide services that are clinically informed culturally relevant wellness oriented and relationship and strengths-based with…
Provide christian literature and bible lessons to interested people
Religious radio broadcasts and distribution of religious materials
Healing Care Canada is providing support and guidance to the healing and care ministries of churches parachurch organizations missionary enterprises and other Christian religious institutions. Programs include regional seminars 16-week…
Conduct transformational training seminars and conferences throughout canada and other countries.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canadian Lifelight Ministries Inc. and the most unlike its peers is House of Hesed (Manitoba) Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TEEN CHALLENGE OF CENTRAL CANADA INC. ↗
- Who funds LIVING BIBLE EXPLORERS ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF HESED (MANITOBA) INC. ↗
- Who funds CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTRE (FAMILY SUPPORT CENTRE) ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN LIFELIGHT MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds JOURNEY CANADA ↗
- Who funds CAREIMPACT INC. ↗
- Who funds 24-7 PRAYER CANADA ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIANS EMPOWERING ORGANIZATIONS MINISTRIES INC/HEART OF ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Abundance Canada · Church of the Rock Inc. · Grant Memorial Baptist Church Inc · The Buller Foundation Inc. · All Charities Campaign · The Winnipeg Foundation · Link Charity Canada Inc · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.