Brantford, ON · Private foundation
Samuel W. Stedman Foundation
The foundation’s charitable purpose of assisting people in brantford brant county and ontario has been carried out by distributing investment income to qualified dodnees.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under C$10k36 grants · C$177k
- C$10k–50k16 grants · C$351k
- C$50k–250k2 grants · C$100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BRANT COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM FOUNDATION | C$50,000 |
| UNITED WAY - BRANT | C$50,000 |
| HAMILTON HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION | C$45,000 |
| ST. JOSEPH'S LIFECARE FOUNDATION/HANKINSON HOUSE HOSPICE | C$45,000 |
| MCMASTER CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | C$40,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO | C$28,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH | C$27,500 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BRANTFORD | C$25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$20,000 |
| LANSDOWNE CHILDREN'S CENTRE FOUNDATION | C$20,000 |
| MCMASTER UNIVERSITY | C$17,000 |
| BRANTFORD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | C$15,000 |
| ST. ANDREWS UNITED CHURCH - SOUP FOR SOUL | C$15,000 |
| GRAND VALLEY EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY | C$12,000 |
| CONESTOGA COLLEGE | C$11,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 0% of grant dollars (C$0). The 100% that went abroad (C$3.6M) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 100% of all-years giving (C$3.6M)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
52 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2023, 15 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$111k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- UWUNITED WAY - BRANT6× · 2017–2023 · C$285k
- BCBRANT COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM FOUNDATION5× · 2017–2023 · C$235k
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BRANTFORD5× · 2017–2023 · C$100k
Funded once
- PAPER ATTACHED SCHEDULESone grant, 2019 · C$390k
- BCBRANT COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · C$50k
- HHHAMILTON HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION-MCMASTERone grant, 2021 · C$35k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2023.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2023, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 115 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.