Repentigny, QC · Charitable organization
Salvation Now
To advance religion by preaching the teachings religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the christian religion
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FEED THE HUNGRY CANADA | C$6,600 |
| MINISTRIES PRINCE ALBERT | C$1,000 |
| GOOD NEWS CHAPEL VANCOUVER | C$1,000 |
| ANDREW REYES EPIC GOSPEL | C$1,000 |
| GOOD NEWS UNIVERSITY | C$1,000 |
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Sunday Services Spreading the word of God
Christian broadcasting live streaming internet television proclaiming the gospel message of the Lord Jesus Christ using television and internet media. Regular worship services and teaching the Word of God.
Preaching the gospel on wednesdays and sundays. outreach programs to the hurting and homeless.
Sunday services prayer meetings evangelism.
Regular worship services missionary outreach evangelism
Worship Services Prayer Meetings Bible Studies Visitation of shut-ins Weddings Funerals Evangelism Baby Dedications Food Bank
Mission services - outreach meals and feeding programs Church services - congregation meetings place of worship bible study shower facility youth outreach
Worship Ministry - Discipleship Ministry - Music Ministry
Sunday am worship services wednesday prayer meetings sunday school
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Good News Chapel - Bc and the most unlike its peers is Lesea Global Feed the Hungry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.