Salt Springs, NB · Charitable organization
Saltsprings United Baptist Church
Weekly morning worship services for all ages.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WORLD VISION OF CANADA | C$564 |
| SUSSEX PREGNANCY CARE CENTRE | C$500 |
| OUR DAILY BREAD MINISTRIES | C$300 |
| HAMPTON BIBLE CAMP | C$250 |
| CAMP TULAKADIK | C$250 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$450 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- WVWORLD VISION8× · 2017–2024 · C$4k · revenue +6%
- SISEND INTERNATION2× · 2021–2023 · C$400 · revenue +11%
- SGSHAREWORLD GLOBAL CANADA(GIDEONS)3× · 2020–2022 · C$170 · revenue +13%
Funded once
- OHONE HOPE CANADAgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$900 · revenue +272%
- TVTHE VOICE OF THE MARTYRS INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$300 · revenue +38%
- UUBWMU/ABWone grant, 2018 · C$286 · revenue -95%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to support and partner with Christian churches and relief organizations around the world to share our faith disciple teach train and serve. We focus on Church Planting & Evangelism Relief & Development and Leadership…
Missions/evangelism
To encourage teach and disciple the christian church around the world.
Transforming lives through god's word through bible translation bible publishing and bible engagement programs throughout canada and the world.
Missions support and religious publishing distribution
Share the Gospel within and outside of Canada through church events and outreach.
To provide training and teaching to Christian church leaders around the world.
Conducts missionary work in the developing countries
To bring Christianity to places that have not been reached as of yet and to train young people to do the same.
Cbm is a global mission organization committed to sharing god's love through word and deed. we believe that god brings healing to a broken world through local churches. with over 150 years of experience we have seen that words and deeds…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Voice of the Martyrs Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Transformation Church. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.