Skip to content

Kelvington, SK · Charitable organization

Royal Canadian Legion Kelvington (Sask. #19) Branch Poppy Func

Poppy campaign

C$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$3k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$2,500
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$7k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KELVINGTON TRANSIT BUS 'TOWN OF KELVINGTON'C$2,500
KELVINDELL LODGE RESIDENT COUNCIL FUNDC$1,100
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 79% of grant dollars (C$23k). The 21% that went abroad (C$6k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 21% of all-years giving (C$6k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$19k · 3 repeat orgsC$11k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
6

Total granted

C$19k
C$11k

Still filing today

0%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TO
    Town of Kelvington-'Kelvington Transit Bus'
    5× · 2017–2021 · C$9k
  • KL
    KELVINDELL LODGE RESIDENT COUNCIL FUND
    3× · 2021–2024 · C$5k
  • KT
    KELVINGTON TRANSIT BUS 'TOWN OF KELVINGTON'
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$5k

Funded once

  • KD
    KELVINGTON & DISTRICT HEALTH CARE FACILITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$3k · revenue +631%
  • RC
    RESIDENT COUNCIL FUND KELVIDELL LODGE
    one grant, 2022 · C$2k
  • S
    Stars
    one grant, 2017 · C$2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field
03the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
1/1
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKELVINGTON & DISTRICT HEALTH CARE FACILITY FOUNDATION — C$3,000 over 1y, 19% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KELVINGTON & DISTRICT HEALTH CARE FACILITY FOUNDATION ↗

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 119127579:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Royal Canadian Legion Kelvington (Sask. #19) Branch Poppy Func’s filings →