Indian Head, SK · Charitable organization
Royal Canadian Legion Indian Head Sask. Branch #114 Poppy Fund
Poppy campaign each year for indian head qu'appelle and mclean districts.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CSMFRC 17 WING DETACHMENT DUNDURN | C$1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 78% of grant dollars (C$5k). The 22% that went abroad (C$1k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 22% of all-years giving (C$1k)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- C1CSMFRC 17 WING DETACHMENT DUNDURN5× · 2019–2024 · C$3k · revenue +1%
- TOTOWN OF INDIAN HEAD2× · 2017–2021 · C$1k
- KFKINSMEN FOUNDATION INC.5× · 2018–2022 · C$500 · revenue -3%
Funded once
- SMSK Military Family Resourceone grant, 2017 · C$500
- C1CSMFRC 17 WING DETACHMENT DUNDUNone grant, 2018 · C$500
- TSTHE SALVATION ARMYgraduatedone grant, 2020 · C$100 · revenue ×16
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.