Yorkton, SK · Charitable organization
Royal Canadian Legion General Alexander Ross Branch # 77
1 distribution of poppies & wreaths 2 conduct remembrance day services at schools - nursing homes 3 provide honor guards at members funeral services 4 financial assistance to veterans programs - local health care facilities 5 bursaries for eligable students 6 support cadet porgram in our region 7 support youth programs in our…
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION SASK COMMAND (PAWS) | C$5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$1,000 |
| YORKTON ARMY CADETS 64 RC ACC #2834 | C$1,000 |
| MOOSE JAW MILITARY FAMILY RESOURCE CENTRE | C$1,000 |
| CENTRAL SASK MILITARY FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER | C$1,000 |
| SIGN-SENIOR MOBILITY PROGRAM | C$80 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 80% of grant dollars (C$102k). The 20% that went abroad (C$26k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 20% of all-years giving (C$26k)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$7k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- THTHE HEALTH FOUNDATION4× · 2018–2021 · C$18k
- RCROYAL CANADIAN LEGION - SASK COMMAND (PAWS FOR VETERANS)3× · 2020–2022 · C$9k
- SHSUNRISE HEALTH FOUNDATION (MEALS ON WHEELS5× · 2018–2023 · C$6k · revenue +37%
Funded once
- SHSunrise Health Regionone grant, 2017 · C$5k
- RCROYAL CANADIAN LEGION SASK COMMAND (PAWS FOR VETERAN)one grant, 2023 · C$5k
- THTHE HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · C$5k · revenue +34%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.