Huntsville, ON · Charitable organization
Royal Canadian Legion Branch 232 Poppy Fund
To provide financial assistance care and comfort to veterans and families of veterans with respect to their medical and pysical needs and the necessities of life.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RCACL - CADETS NORSEMAN 844 | C$6,000 |
| ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION SERVICE DOGS | C$5,000 |
| DISTRICT E HEROES MENDING ON THE FLY | C$2,000 |
| ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION ONTARIO COMMAND SERVICE BUREAU | C$2,000 |
| ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION ONTARIO COMMAND - RUCK | C$2,000 |
| ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION - ONTARIO COMMAND HOMELESS VETERANS | C$2,000 |
| ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION ONTARIO COMMAND CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | C$2,000 |
| ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION DISTRICT HOSPITAL TRUST | C$1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 0% of grant dollars (C$0). The 100% that went abroad (C$125k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 100% of all-years giving (C$125k)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$13k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- RCRCACL - CADETS NORSEMENT 8443× · 2017–2019 · C$13k
- RCROYAL CANADIAN LEGION ONT. COMMAND-SUPPORT OF SERVICE DOGS2× · 2021–2022 · C$9k
- RCROYAL CANADIAN LEGION - ONT. COMMAND - CHARITABLE FOUNDATION3× · 2020–2022 · C$8k
Funded once
- RCROYAL CANADIAN LEGION -S UPPORT OF SERVICE DOGSone grant, 2020 · C$6k
- RCROYAL CANADIAN LEGION ONT. COMMAND - VETERAN'S COMFORTone grant, 2019 · C$4k
- RCROYAL CANADIAN LEGION-ONTARIO COMMAND-YOUTH EDUCATIONone grant, 2023 · C$3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.