Skip to content
Canadian charities

Winnipeg, MB · Private foundation

Rosewarne Foundation Inc.

The mission of the orgaization is to provide financial assistance to charitable undertakings as determined by the board of the organization from time to time.

C$70k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$30k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$20,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CANADIAN 'BRIDGES FOR PEACE' ASSOCIATION INCC$30,000
AMAZON EVANGELISM SOCIETYC$20,000
THE SALVATION ARMYC$20,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$285k · 5 repeat orgsC$30k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against -16% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
1

Total granted

C$285k
C$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
-16%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • AE
    AMAZON EVANGELISM SOCIETY
    6× · 2018–2024 · C$95k · revenue +9% · 36% of their budget
  • C'
    CANADIAN 'BRIDGES FOR PEACE' ASSOCIATION INC.
    4× · 2017–2024 · C$70k · revenue +36%
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    5× · 2018–2023 · C$60k · revenue ×167

Funded once

  • RS
    ROCK SOLID REFUGE INC
    one grant, 2022 · C$10k · revenue -16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMAZON EVANGELISM SOCIETY — C$95,000 over 6y, 36% of budgetCANADIAN 'BRIDGES FOR PEACE' ASSOCIATION INC. — C$70,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetTHE SALVATION ARMY — C$60,000 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetST AIDAN'S CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC. — C$40,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetUNION GOSPEL MISSION — C$20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetROCK SOLID REFUGE INC — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 832828164:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Rosewarne’s filings →