Winnipeg, MB · Charitable organization
Ron Bartlette Wellness Training Inc.
Assisted workers who are umeployed or under employed in obtaining alternate or subsequent employment by providing appropraite job search skills.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMPASSION CANADA | C$1,064 |
| YOUTH FOR CHRIST | C$1,000 |
| FORWARD HOUSE | C$1,000 |
| CHILDREN'S CAMP INTERNATIONAL | C$350 |
| CALVARY TEMPLE | C$50 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TCTeen Challenge6× · 2017–2022 · C$16k · revenue +138%
- YFYOUTH FOR CHRIST8× · 2017–2024 · C$10k
- CCChildren's Camp International8× · 2017–2024 · C$8k · revenue -11%
Funded once
- FSFamily Support of Winnipeggraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$3k · revenue +42%
- WHWINNIPEG HARVESTone grant, 2021 · C$2k · revenue -6%
- SSTARSgraduatedone grant, 2021 · C$1k · revenue +30%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Operate residential drug rehabilitation program for youth across canada print and distribute drug prevention literature provide counselling to parents and youth with addiction related problems
Rmhc manitoba supports the health and well-being of children by providing a 'home-away-from-home' and other essential servicces for critically ill chronically ill and seriously injured children and their families
Food for the Hungry (FH) Canada part of the global FH family is a Christian not-for-profit organization dedicated to ending poverty worldwide. With partners across Canada and the world FH walks alongside vulnerable communities throughout…
Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) is a global non-profit organization that strives to share God's love and compassion through relief development and peacebuilding. MCC Manitoba supports the international relief development and peace…
Chemical dependency education and counselling in manitoba.
to provide child care services in the City of Winnipeg
The calgary dream centre's programs provide recovery-oriented training vocational training and housing opportunities to those experiencing addiction and homelessness. at the calgary dream centre people are given the resources and…
Manitoba adolescent treatment centre provides inpatient and out patient accomodation as well as rehabilitative and medical care and treatment programs to children and adolescents in
Operates a palliative care hospice in winnipeg
The organization provides child care services for children from ages three months to twelve years at daycare facilities located in winnipeg manitoba.
Operations of two missions houses as well as a housing facility offering support to children teens aborginal individuals and the chronically homeless in winnipeg's inner city.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Harvest Manitoba Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Childrens Camps International Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Church of the Rock Inc. · Abundance Canada · The Winnipeg Foundation · All Charities Campaign · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.