Riverton, MB · Public foundation
Riverton McC Community Assistance Centre Inc.
Operating a thrift store.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k1 grant · C$250
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$44k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE | C$43,703 |
| RIVERTON & DISTRICT FRIENDSHIP CENTRE | C$250 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- RGRIVERTON GOSPEL CHAPEL2× · 2022–2023 · C$4k · revenue +7%
- RDRIVERTON & DISTRICT FRIENDSHIP CENTRE8× · 2017–2024 · C$3k · revenue +93%
- CPCANADA POST COMMUNITY FOUNDAITON3× · 2017–2019 · C$150 · revenue +38%
Funded once
- MCMEMMONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE MANITOBAone grant, 2021 · C$120k
- MCMennonite Central Committee-Manitobaone grant, 2017 · C$105k
- MCMENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE MANITOBAone grant, 2018 · C$101k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.