Nepean, ON · Charitable organization
River Jordan Ministries
Sunday worship service Youth and Young adult service prayer service choir rehearsal discipleship meeting Bible study class Pastoral care and Pastoral care counseling.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Immigrants Integration Support Services | C$6,100 |
| CHRIST'S CHAPEL BIBLE CHURCH MINISTRIES | C$250 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$250 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- IIImmigrants Integration Support Services2× · 2022–2023 · C$29k · revenue +244%
- WSWells Salvation Church2× · 2021–2022 · C$4k · revenue +40%
- EPEGLISE PENTECOTISTE EL SHADDAI2× · 2018–2021 · C$300 · revenue +71%
Funded once
- OWONE WAY MINISTRIESgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$500 · revenue +35%
- EAEmmanuel Apostoloic Churchgraduatedone grant, 2022 · C$500 · revenue +36%
- TOTHE OASISone grant, 2019 · C$380 · revenue -55%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Worship services prayer and bible study
Weekly church services bible study meetings outreach and evangelism.
Worship services - Sundays Prayer meetings - Wednesdays
Preaching and teaching the word of god and counselling(sun. 10:00am-1:00pm) visitation & counselling (sun. 4:00pm-7:00pm) bible study (wed. 7:00pm-8:00pm) holy communion service (fri. 7:00pm-8:00pm) annointing service every last friday of…
We hold weekly worship service.
We conduct a weekly worship service on every sunday we hold on prayer meetings and bible studies weekly we also give pastoral care and counselling we conduct outreach and evangelism to the community.
We conduct sunday morning worship service and sunday night worship service. we conduct prayer meeting and bible study weekly.
Sunday worship service and message or teaching: periodic prayer meetings and evangelism events.
Prayer meetings Bible studies Sunday morning worship
We hold the following services: Sunday and Wednesday worship services Sunday children services Friday youth service
(1) weekly church service (2) weekly bible study (3) pastorl care (40 women and men's ministry (5) youth ministry
Regular worship services evangelism
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christ's Chapel Bible Church and the most unlike its peers is Immigrants Integration Support Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Immigrants Integration Support Services ↗
- Who funds Wells Salvation Church ↗
- Who funds ONE WAY MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Emmanuel Apostoloic Church ↗
- Who funds THE OASIS ↗
- Who funds EGLISE PENTECOTISTE EL SHADDAI ↗
- Who funds CHRIST'S CHAPEL BIBLE CHURCH MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Mountain of fire and miracles ↗
- Who funds FAITH CHAPEL ORLEANS ↗
- Who funds LIVING PRAISE MINISTRIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.