Winnipeg, MB · Charitable organization
River East Mennonite Church Inc.
Pastoral care promotion of religion through wotship services religious eduction
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DOMINICAN VISION INC | C$3,135 |
| MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITEE | C$1,500 |
| PEACE RIVER GOSPEL CHURCH | C$750 |
| YOUTH FOR CHRIST | C$750 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- MCMENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE6× · 2018–2024 · C$16k · revenue +43%
- DVDOMINICAN VISION INC3× · 2022–2024 · C$7k · revenue -26%
- SMSiloam Mission3× · 2019–2022 · C$6k · revenue +38%
Funded once
- MNMULTI NATION MISSIONS FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · C$5k · revenue +58%
- MCMennonite Church Canadaone grant, 2018 · C$2k · revenue -36%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.