Hamilton, ON · Public foundation
Richard Robinson Prescott Court (Rrpc) Innovation Foundation Inc.
The rrpc innovaton foundation supports youth across niagara through partnerships in education nutrition sports advocacy and mental health.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under C$10k1 grant · C$3k
- C$50k–250k1 grant · C$192k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| STEP SUPPORTING TEEN EMPOWERMENT | C$192,000 |
| FOOD4KIDS NIAGARA | C$3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 73% of grant dollars (C$526k). The 27% that went abroad (C$192k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 27% of all-years giving (C$192k)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$195k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SGST. GEORGE'S ANGLICAN CHURCH2× · 2020–2021 · C$150k · revenue +145% · 35% of their budget
- UWUNITED WAY NIAGARA2× · 2021–2022 · C$93k · revenue +15%
- CCCOMMUNITY CARE - ST. CATHARINES AND THOROLD2× · 2021–2022 · C$14k · revenue +0%
Funded once
- EFEDUCATION FOUNDAITON OF NIAGARAone grant, 2021 · C$125k · revenue -35%
- TRTHE RIDLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · C$100k · revenue +33%
- THTHE HILL ACADEMYone grant, 2021 · C$31k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Food bank emergency financial assistance christmas food and back to school drives
To provide financial support through the awarding of scholarships to elementary and secondary catholic schools within the jurisdiction of the niagara catholic district school board
The dsbn is committed to student success by working together to inspire empower and support all learners to achieve their full portential
Offering grant programs: environmental grants childrens summer camp grants community grants and youth grants. grants are awarded for equipment special projects and seed funding. the community grants program does not provide operating…
We are a charity dedicated to building healthy communities by fostering a sense of belonging for all. By create safe and welcoming spaces that serve people of all ages backgrounds and abilities the YMCA is committed to ensuring everyone…
Provide food through a food bank for northumberland county communities
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way Niagara and the most unlike its peers is Ridley College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ST. GEORGE'S ANGLICAN CHURCH ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION FOUNDAITON OF NIAGARA ↗
- Who funds THE RIDLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY NIAGARA ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CARE - ST. CATHARINES AND THOROLD ↗
- Who funds FOOD4KIDS NIAGARA ↗
- Who funds TOMORROWS VOICES ↗
- Who funds PATHSTONE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NIAGARA REGIONAL NATIVE CENTRE ↗
- Who funds PORT CARES ↗
- Who funds CANADA HELPS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Niagara Community Foundation Fondation Communautaire de Niagara · Wise Guys Charity Fund · United Way Niagara · Niagara Region Police Association Charitable Fund · Barterpay It Forward Foundation · Abundance Canada · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · Vancouver Foundation · My Tribute Gift Foundation · United Way of Greater Toronto · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.