Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Saint-Leonard, QC · Charitable organization

Reseau Technoscience

1- coordination des expo-sciences de la finale québécoise; 2- sessions de formation et gestion d'activities d'animation du club des débrouillards; 3- organisations des concours régionaux pour le défi génie inventif et la finale québécoise.

C$35k
Granted FY2021
5
Grants FY2021
1
Regions reached
C$7k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2021 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$7,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TECHNOSCIENCE SAGUENAY LAC ST JEANC$7,000
TECHNOSCIENCE ABITBI-TEMISCAMINGUEC$7,000
CONSEIL DU LOISIR SCIENTIFIQUE DE L'ESTRIEC$7,000
CENTRE DU LOISIR SCIENTIFIQUE DE LA MAURICIEC$7,000
BOITE À SCIENCE-CONSEIL DU LOISIR SCIENTIFIQUE DE QCC$7,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$111k · 6 repeat orgsC$5k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2021, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

C$111k
C$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+60%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    CENTRE DU LOISIR SCIENTIFIQUE DE LA MAURICIE
    4× · 2018–2021 · C$24k · revenue +34%
  • TA
    TECHNOSCIENCE ABITIBI-TEMISCAMINGUE
    4× · 2018–2021 · C$22k · revenue +11%
  • RT
    RESEAU TECHNOSCIENCE
    4× · 2018–2021 · C$22k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • CD
    conseil du loisir scientifique de l'Estriegraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$5k · revenue +60%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTRE DU LOISIR SCIENTIFIQUE DE LA MAURICIE — C$23,900 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTECHNOSCIENCE ABITIBI-TEMISCAMINGUE — C$22,100 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetRESEAU TECHNOSCIENCE — C$21,750 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetTECHNOSCIENCE SAGUENAY-LAC SAINT JEAN — C$10,550 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetconseil du loisir scientifique de l'Estrie — C$4,750 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2021-08-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2021. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of schools and education.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 101098234:2021-08-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Reseau Technoscience’s filings →