Skip to content

Surrey, BC · Private foundation

Reimer Foundation

The REIMER FOUNDATION received donations of $1 624 411 and disbursed $1 648 360 to qualified donees in 2024.

C$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$5k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$40k
  • C$250k+2 grants · C$1.6M
C$20,000
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$6.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILLINGDON CHURCHC$1,001,610
COLUMBIA BIBLE COLLEGEC$600,500
MB SEMINARYC$20,000
GREAT COMMISSION FOUNDATIONC$10,000
SIM CANADAC$10,000
ADVOKATE ABBOTSFORDC$5,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 84% of grant dollars (C$7.5M). The 16% that went abroad (C$1.4M) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 16% of all-years giving (C$1.4M)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$8.7M · 13 repeat orgsC$269k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
11

Total granted

C$8.7M
C$269k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+27%

Still filing today

62%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MB SEMINARY
    2× · 2022–2024 · C$40k · revenue +52%
  • SC
    SIM CANADA
    3× · 2018–2024 · C$25k · revenue +27%
  • AL
    ADVOCATE LIFE & EDUCATION
    4× · 2018–2024 · C$12k · revenue +221%

Funded once

  • AL
    ABUDANT LIFE HOME
    one grant, 2022 · C$113k
  • AL
    ABUNDANT LIFE HOME
    one grant, 2023 · C$100k
  • GF
    GIVECLEAR FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$25k · revenue +27%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Canadian Southern Baptist Seminary

Canadian Southern Baptist Seminary provides theological education for preparation of individuals for pastors and other types of Christian ministries. The education involves provision of instruction materials scholarships housing library…

—
2
International Christian Ministries

International Christian Ministries (ICM) trains and equips Christian leaders in Africa Eastern Europe and Latin America with and through its agents. These training initiatives include various Christian seminars and conferences facilitating…

—
3
Canadian Mennonite University

Christian University Education

—
4
Canadian Baptist Ministries

Cbm is a global mission organization committed to sharing god's love through word and deed. we believe that god brings healing to a broken world through local churches. with over 150 years of experience we have seen that words and deeds…

—
5
Tyndale University

Tyndale University is dedicated to the pursuit of truth to excellence in teaching learning and research for the enriching of mind heart and character to serve the church and the world for the glory of God. Ongoing programs: 1) To provide a…

—
6
Bic Canada - Global

Our mission is to support and partner with Christian churches and relief organizations around the world to share our faith disciple teach train and serve. We focus on Church Planting & Evangelism Relief & Development and Leadership…

—
7
Going Beyond Missions

Missionary trainings On-line and On-site mission trips Church planting trainings

—
8
Global Christian Ministries

Developing ministries and christian leadership by training pastors and lay workers funding missionary outreach program including attendance by chairman in countries where mission work is done

—
9
Kingswood University

Kingswood University is accredited through the Commission on Accreditation of the Association for Biblical Higher Education (ABHE) and provides a number of educational options including 3-4 year baccalaureate degrees focused on vocational…

—
10
Chinese International Missions (Canada)

Provide education and encouragement to developing countries conduct seminars and provide overseas short-term mission trops to christians recruit and train missionaries to work

—
11
Care Ministries International (Canada)

1. missionary organization evangeliism-send missionaries to cambodia 2. education/training programs-language teaching 3. medical services-short term medical mission team to mission field

—
12
Ces China Evangelical Seminary Society

Christian education

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sim Canada and the most unlike its peers is Villa Cathay Care Home Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRSM LEGACY FOUNDATION — C$5,013,200 over 2y, 47% of budgetCOLUMBIA BIBLE COLLEGE — C$1,460,697 over 7y, 9.6% of budgetMB MISSION — C$183,682 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMB MISSION / C2C — C$75,741 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMB SEMINARY — C$40,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetGIVECLEAR FOUNDATION — C$25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSIM CANADA — C$25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetADVOCATE LIFE & EDUCATION — C$12,250 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetRATANAK INTERNATIONAL — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMPASSION CANADA — C$3,534 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVILLA CATHAY CARE HOME — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVANCOUVER CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — C$767 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTERRY FOX FOUNDATION — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE SEA FOUNDATION — C$312 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RSM LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA BIBLE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MB MISSION ↗
  • Who funds MB MISSION / C2C ↗
  • Who funds MB SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds GIVECLEAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SIM CANADA ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCATE LIFE & EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds RATANAK INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSION CANADA ↗
  • Who funds VILLA CATHAY CARE HOME ↗
  • Who funds VANCOUVER CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds TERRY FOX FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLUE SEA FOUNDATION ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nicola Wealth Private Giving FoundationBC9.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nicola Wealth Private Giving Foundation · Fleming Foundation · Abundance Canada · Vancouver Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations advancing religion.

Source object 877755769:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Reimer’s filings →