Skip to content

Regina, SK · Charitable organization

Regina Education and Action on Community Hunger Incorporated

Food security programs & services including: support to child feeding programs; nutrition and food access to seniors low income families & health care clients; education services to children newcomers & other disadvantaged groups.

C$169k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$60k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k10 grants · C$37k
  • C$10k–50k4 grants · C$72k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$60k
C$4,400
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$851k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REGINA FOOD FOR LEARNINGC$60,000
CIRCLE PROJECT DAYCAREC$26,100
EARLY LEARNING CENTERC$18,700
RAINBOW YOUTH CENTREC$16,300
KIDS FIRST DAYCARE INCC$11,000
KITCHENER SCHOOLC$7,500
MCDERMID COMMUNITY SCHOOLC$7,000
SCOTT COLLEGIATE INFANT DAY CAREC$4,400
ALBERT COMMUNITY SCHOOLC$3,300
SHIRLEY SCHNEIDER SUPPORT CENTREC$3,000
SCEP CENTREC$2,700
Individual grant recipientC$2,500
FW JOHNSON HIGH SCHOOLC$2,500
ROSEMONT COMMUNITY SCHOOLC$2,200
THE CRESCENTS SCHOOLC$2,200
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 89% of grant dollars (C$1.2M). The 11% that went abroad (C$146k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 11% of all-years giving (C$146k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.3M · 24 repeat orgsC$125k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
6

Total granted

C$1.3M
C$125k

Still filing today

25%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • EL
    EARLY LEARNING CENTER
    5× · 2019–2024 · C$82k · revenue +37%
  • CP
    CIRCLE PROJECT DAYCARE
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$50k · revenue +2%
  • SC
    SCOTT COLLEGIATE INFANT DAY CARE
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$32k · revenue +163%

Funded once

  • RF
    Regina Food For Learning
    one grant, 2017 · C$57k
  • CP
    Circle Project Daycare
    one grant, 2017 · C$24k
  • KC
    Kitchener Community School
    one grant, 2017 · C$16k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field
03the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetREGINA FOOD FOR LEARNING — C$114,340 over 2y, 15% of budgetEARLY LEARNING CENTER — C$81,700 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCIRCLE PROJECT DAYCARE — C$49,800 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSCOTT COLLEGIATE INFANT DAY CARE — C$32,400 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetRAINBOW YOUTH CENTRE — C$31,100 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSCEP CENTRE — C$16,578 over 8y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds REGINA FOOD FOR LEARNING ↗
  • Who funds EARLY LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CIRCLE PROJECT DAYCARE ↗
  • Who funds SCOTT COLLEGIATE INFANT DAY CARE ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOW YOUTH CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds SCEP CENTRE ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of ReginaSK9.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Regina · Saskatchewan Community Foundation Corp. · Wesley United Church · Lorne and Evelyn Johnson Foundation · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-03-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under foundations.

Source object 131314650:2024-03-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Regina Education and Action on Community Hunger’s filings →