North Bay, ON · Charitable organization
Redeemer Lutheran Church
Worship services a minimum of once a week.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Canada Lutheran World Relief | C$930 |
| Eastern Synod of the ELCIC | C$270 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- ESEASTERN SYNOD OF THE ELCIC6× · 2017–2024 · C$8k · revenue -14%
- PSPackSan Smiles Organization2× · 2017–2019 · C$4k · revenue +22%
- CLCanada Lutheran World Relief7× · 2017–2024 · C$2k · revenue +56%
Funded once
- L(LAMP (Lutheran Association of Missionaries & Pilots Inc.)one grant, 2018 · C$2k · revenue -42%
- TGThe Gathering Placegraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$500 · revenue +42%
- SBST. BRICE'S ANGLICAN CHURCHone grant, 2020 · C$500 · revenue +17%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EASTERN SYNOD OF THE ELCIC ↗
- Who funds PackSan Smiles Organization ↗
- Who funds LAMP (Lutheran Association of Missionaries & Pilots Inc.) ↗
- Who funds Canada Lutheran World Relief ↗
- Who funds The Gathering Place ↗
- Who funds ST. BRICE'S ANGLICAN CHURCH ↗
- Who funds EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN CANADA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.