Skip to content

Vancouver, BC · Private foundation

Red Chair Foundation

During the year the charity donated $218 500 to qualified donees throughout canada to assist them in supporting the following initiatives: education and health of girls and women in canada and internationally efforts to slow the impact of climate change and the development of young people in africa to become effective health managers.

C$219k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
Regions reached
C$70k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • C$10k–50k5 grants · C$95k
  • C$50k–250k2 grants · C$124k
C$25,000
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$107k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CANADIAN WOMEN'S FOUNDATIONC$70,000
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION CANADAC$53,500
TOSTAN CANADA INC.C$30,000
ONE GIRL CAN SOCIETYC$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTAC$20,000
EQUALITY FUND FONDS ÉGALITÉC$10,000
ACADEMICS WITHOUT BORDERSC$10,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$591k · 6 repeat orgsC$20k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +3% since the first grant, against -41% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

C$591k
C$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
-41%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$10k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION CANADA
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$75k · revenue +24%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$60k · revenue +3%
  • EF
    EQUALITY FUND FONDS ÉGALITÉ
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$30k · revenue +118%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CAROL SHIELDS PRIZE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · C$10k · revenue -41%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Camfed Canada

1. advancing education in sub-saharan africa by: a) providing publicly available scholarships bursaries and other forms of needs based financial assistance to women and girls as well as men and boys to be used to support their education…

—
2
The Spark of Hope Foundation

The foundation collaborates and partners with universities around the world to ensure marginalized young females primarily from the Global South in remote areas and in areas of conflict get access to post secondary education through…

—
3
Cameras for Girls

Cameras For Girls pursues Women’s Empowerment and Gender Equality in Africa using photography as our catalyst. We provide women who face gender-based barriers to employment with a camera to keep and a 4-phase photography storytelling and…

—
4
International Development Research Centre

Created by Parliament in 1970 IDRC has been committed in supporting research in developing countries undertaken by the people of those countries for their own development. IDRC has five areas of focus: Climate-Resilient Food Systems Global…

—
5
Women's Education and Literacy in Nepal

Education and literacy proprograms for women in nepal income generation projects for women in nepal scholarship

—
6
Fora: Network for Change

Fora: network for change is global network of young feminist changemakers. through our governance programming leadership development social impact initiatives and feminist research we make bold strategic investments in young women and…

—
7
Mastercard Foundation

The fondation's mission is to advance youth education and promote financial inclusion for financially disadvantaged persons and communities. with a focus on africa the foundation aims to expand access to learning employment…

—
8
The Equality Effect

The Equality Effect uses human rights law to achieve concrete change in the lives of women and girls in Ghana Kenya and Malawi - change that will improve the health safety and standard of living of women and girls. 16 Girls: the '160…

—
9
The Canadian Foundation for Women's Health

To distribute funding to organizations and universities for research in the field of women's sexual reproductive health.

—
10
Children Believe Fund

Children Believe is a global charity dedicated to removing the barriers to education that steal children’s choices one by one until they have none. For sixty years the organization has brought together brave young dreamers caring…

—
11
The Hunger Project

Ongoing programs: the hunger project canada and in partnership with the global hunger project will carry out programs of the following regions: ending hunger in rural communities in africa india bangladesh mexico and peru through the…

—
12
C.T.F. Trust Fund

The work of the international and social justice area is under the unbrella 'teachers action for learning' and subcategorized in three core areas of: 1) teachers' action for teaching (tat) focusing on professional development of educators…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canadian Women's Foundation / Fondation Canadienne Des Femmes and the most unlike its peers is The Governors of the University of Alberta. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCANADIAN WOMEN'S FOUNDATION — C$200,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetONE GIRL CAN SOCIETY — C$117,750 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetTOSTAN CANADA INC. — C$108,685 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION CANADA — C$74,700 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA — C$60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEQUALITY FUND FONDS ÉGALITÉ — C$30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CAROL SHIELDS PRIZE FOUNDATION — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetACADEMICS WITHOUT BORDERS — C$10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance CanadaON6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 706320884:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Red Chair’s filings →