Invermere, BC · Charitable organization
Radium Christian Fellowship
Christian-outreach-in-the-columbia-valley -sunday-services-of-praise -worship -studying-god's-word -fellowship-and-mid-week-meeting.-we-hold-services-in edgewater -wilmer-&-brisco.-we-have-vaction-bible-studies-during-the-summer-and-outreach-services…
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INSPIRATION MINISTRIES | C$2,000 |
| MSC CANADA | C$500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2022, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- IMINSPIRATION MINISTRIES3× · 2018–2022 · C$3k · revenue +16%
- MCMSC CANADA2× · 2021–2022 · C$1k · revenue -1%
- RHRADIUM HOT SPRINGS SENIORS CLUB3× · 2017–2019 · C$1k
Funded once
- IAINDEPENDENT ASSEMBLIES OF GOD INTERNATIONAL (CANADAgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue +155%
- RHRADIUM HOT SPRINGS PUBLIC LIBRARYgraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$400 · revenue +27%
- WVWINDERMERE VALLEY SHARED MINISTRYone grant, 2017 · C$400 · revenue -82%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.