Skip to content

Edmonton, AB · Charitable organization

R C Parish of the Assumption

Teaching the catholic faith advancement of religion provide weekly worship services provide pastoral care provide ministries for all ages.

C$20k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$19k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k3 grants · C$2k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$19k
C$860
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$270k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF EDMONTONC$18,535
SAINT VINCENT DE PAULC$860
YOUTH EMPOWERMENT AND SUPPORT SERVICESC$580
CHALICE CANADAC$504
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$3.1M · 5 repeat orgsC$16k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
10

Total granted

C$3.1M
C$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+60%

Still filing today

60%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$580 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF EDMONTON
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$3.1M · revenue +34% · 43% of their budget
  • SV
    ST. VINCENT DE PAUL
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$9k · revenue +74%
  • CC
    CHALICE CANADA
    2× · 2017–2024 · C$948 · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • EH
    E4C HOT LUNCH PROGRAM
    one grant, 2018 · C$4k
  • EH
    E$C HOT LUNCH PROGRAM
    one grant, 2019 · C$4k
  • EH
    E4C HOT LUNCH PROGRAMgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue +31%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF EDMONTON — C$3,116,154 over 8y, 43% of budgetST. VINCENT DE PAUL — C$8,715 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetE4C HOT LUNCH PROGRAM — C$2,479 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHALICE CANADA — C$948 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNO ROOM IN THE INN — C$685 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH EMPOWERMENT AND SUPPORT SERVICES — C$580 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF EDMONTON ↗
  • Who funds ST. VINCENT DE PAUL ↗
  • Who funds E4C HOT LUNCH PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds CHALICE CANADA ↗
  • Who funds NO ROOM IN THE INN ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH EMPOWERMENT AND SUPPORT SERVICES ↗

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 130632243:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on R C Parish of the Assumption’s filings →