Ste Rose Du Lac, MB · Public foundation
Prevost Foundation Inc.
The Prevost Foundation Inc.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k2 grants · C$7k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$11k
- C$50k–250k1 grant · C$144k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Ste Rose Health Centre Inc | C$144,064 |
| Municipality of Ste Rose | C$10,815 |
| C-Fan | C$3,605 |
| Ste Rose du Lima Roman Catholic Parish | C$3,605 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$4k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SRSte. Rose Health Centre Inc.8× · 2017–2024 · C$843k · revenue +27%
- MOMunicipality of Ste. Rose6× · 2018–2024 · C$104k
- SRSte. Rose du Lima Roman Catholic Parish8× · 2017–2024 · C$88k · revenue -37%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · C$1k
- LPLaurier Play Zoneone grant, 2023 · C$74
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.