Ottawa, ON · Charitable organization
Presbytery of East Toronto
Provided interim moderators and pulpit supply to congregations.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k2 grants · C$18k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$18k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Portland Place Non-Profit Housing | C$18,000 |
| Ecumenical Chaplaincy at the University of Toronto | C$9,000 |
| ARISE Ministry | C$9,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +86% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- AMARISE Ministry8× · 2017–2024 · C$269k · revenue +86%
- PPPortland Place Non-Profit Housing8× · 2017–2024 · C$81k · revenue +8%
- ECEcumenical Chaplaincy at the University of Toronto8× · 2017–2024 · C$71k · revenue +81%
Funded once
- AHAnishnawbe Health Foundationone grant, 2021 · C$10k · revenue -28%
- BPBeaches Presbyterian Churchone grant, 2017 · C$7k · revenue +17%
- QSQueen Street East Presbyterian Churchgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$7k · revenue +86%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Worship services sunday school outreach activities prayer meetings
We hold weekly church services. We give pastoral care through community-based small groups. We oversee a student-led ministry to University of Toronto. We partner with and donate to both local and international organizations that assist…
Worship services pastoral care and counselling support for missions
We hold worship services weekly. We feed and provide overnight shelter to homeless youth through the Haven Too Emergency Shelter program twice per week. We offer pastoral care.
CHURCH: Supporting The Presbyterian Church In Canada. Weekly worship services and providing ministries for all persons including pastoral care and visitation.
Worship services Christian education refugee sponsorships support for victims of human trafficking.
To provide basic needs for the homeless refugees abused marriage counselling and new comers to canada. to spread the christian gospel around the local community and the city
A church - support the work of the Presbyterian Church in Canada
Holding worship and prayer services to provide spiritual direction and teaching (twice weekly) and outreach into the surrounding community with the message of the gospel of jesus christ.
We hold worship services weekly We give pastoral care
We offer pastoral care and Bible studies. We provide online resourcing and preaching by staff and volunteers related to faith topics. We offer faith leadership and programming for youth and young adults. Weekly supper and worship
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leaside Presbyterian Church and the most unlike its peers is Portland Place Non-Profit Housing Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ARISE Ministry ↗
- Who funds Portland Place Non-Profit Housing ↗
- Who funds Ecumenical Chaplaincy at the University of Toronto ↗
- Who funds Evangel Hall Mission ↗
- Who funds Boarding Homes Ministry ↗
- Who funds Anishnawbe Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds Beaches Presbyterian Church ↗
- Who funds Queen Street East Presbyterian Church ↗
- Who funds Armagh ↗
- Who funds Leaside Presbyterian Church ↗
- Who funds Toronto Formosan Presbyterian Church ↗
- Who funds Synod of Central Northeastern Ontario and Bermuda ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Trustee Board of the Presbyterian Church in Canada · Glenview Presbyterian Church · St. Andrew's Presbyterian Church · Calvin Presbyterian Church · Trinity Presbyterian Church · Toronto Foundation · My Tribute Gift Foundation · United Way of Greater Toronto · Canadahelps Canadon · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.