Preeceville, SK · Charitable organization
Preeceville-Sturgis United Church Official Board
We support mission & service carry out ministries for women men youth & children.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k3 grants · C$600
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| United Church Of Canada | C$10,313 |
| St. Andrews | C$300 |
| Telemiracle | C$200 |
| Wellman Lake Bible Camp | C$100 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- UCUNITED CHURCH OF CANADA8× · 2017–2024 · C$95k · revenue +22%
- SAST. ANDREWS COLLEGE7× · 2018–2024 · C$2k · revenue -16%
- AIAmnesty International6× · 2018–2023 · C$1k · revenue -3%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · C$400
- SAST ANDREWS COLLEGEone grant, 2017 · C$400
- FTFILLING THE GAPone grant, 2017 · C$400
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.