Saskatoon, SK · Charitable organization
Prairie Pine Presbytery
A court of united church of canada which has oversight of pastoral charges.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2018
- Under C$10k5 grants · C$5k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORTHERN SASK HOSPITAL CHAPLANCY | C$10,062 |
| ECUMENICAL CHAPLAINCY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN | C$1,000 |
| ST ANDREWS COLLEG | C$1,000 |
| SANDY SAULTEAUX SPIRITUAL CENTRE | C$1,000 |
| CENTRE FOR CHRISTIAN STUDIES | C$1,000 |
| OLIVER LODGE SPECIAL CARE HOME | C$1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2018, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- NSNORTHERN SASK HOSPITAL CHAPLANCY2× · 2017–2018 · C$28k
- OLOLIVER LODGE SPECIAL CARE HOME2× · 2017–2018 · C$2k
- SSSANDY SAULTEAUX SPIRITUAL CENTRE2× · 2017–2018 · C$2k · revenue +43%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.