New Westminster, BC · Charitable organization
Potter's Place Mission Society
1.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| House of Restoration | C$5,000 |
| New Livingstones Fellowship | C$5,000 |
| Woman's Hill Ministry in Canada | C$3,000 |
| Gil But Church | C$3,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- HOHouse of Restoration4× · 2021–2024 · C$21k · revenue +24%
- ABAboriginal Bible Academy3× · 2021–2023 · C$10k · revenue +30%
- GBGil But Church2× · 2023–2024 · C$4k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- CSCompassion School and BAM Societyone grant, 2021 · C$100k · revenue -53% · 39% of their budget
- ACAYC Churchone grant, 2023 · C$30k · revenue -6% · 28% of their budget
- JCJuwon Churchgraduatedone grant, 2023 · C$8k · revenue +41%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Regular Wednesday Sunday and Special services -Spiritual Revival Service and Pastoral Care -Holy Bible Study and Religious education -Missionary Activities
We conduct a weekly worship service on every sunday we hold on prayer meetings and bible studies weekly we also give pastoral care and counselling we conduct outreach and evangelism to the community.
Weekly worship service pastoral care
Sunday and mid-week services bible studies sunday school for chidren and youth counselling homeless missionary volunteering in other missionary activities
Hold weekly worship services hold religious meetings such as prayer meetings conduct sunday bible classes
Regular worship services bible studies prayer meetings revival meetings and fellowship.
Church services - prayer meetings - bible studies
We hold weekly worship sunday school and evangelical services.
Perform regular christian worship services -perform bible studies -hold regular prayer meetings adn revival meeting
Hold sunday worship services bible classes prayer meetings provide pastoral care to members promote christian values and fellowship among members make visits to the sick
Sunday worship service communion service bible studies prayer meeting home fellowship meetings hospital visitation funeral services
Prayer meetings Bible studies Sunday morning worship
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ayc Church and the most unlike its peers is Compassion School Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Compassion School and BAM Society ↗
- Who funds AYC Church ↗
- Who funds New Livingstones Fellowship ↗
- Who funds House of Restoration ↗
- Who funds Aboriginal Bible Academy ↗
- Who funds Juwon Church ↗
- Who funds Gil But Church ↗
- Who funds Woman's Hill Ministry in Canada ↗
- Who funds One Church - Church of the Nazarene Canada Pacific District ↗
- Who funds Abbotsford Pentecostal Assembly ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Coram Deo Foundation · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.