Milford Bay, ON · Charitable organization
Port Carling United Church
Weekly worship services at the church in-person or via youtube.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA - MISSION AND SERVICE | C$9,455 |
| SOUTH MUSKOKA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | C$1,000 |
| WEST MUSKOKA FOOD BANK | C$500 |
| HOSPICE MUSKOKA - ANDY'S HOUSE | C$500 |
| MANNA FOOD BANK OF BRACEBRIDGE | C$500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TUTHE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA - MISSION AND SERVICE8× · 2017–2024 · C$70k · revenue +22%
- WMWest Muskoka Food Bank4× · 2017–2024 · C$5k · revenue +234%
- HMHOSPICE MUSKOKA - ANDY'S HOUSE4× · 2019–2022 · C$2k · revenue ×11
Funded once
- HUHILLCREST UNITED CHURCHone grant, 2022 · C$6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.