Skip to content

Winnipeg, MB · Public foundation

Platinum Jets Inc.

To receive and maintain a fund or funds and to apply all or part of the principal and interest therefrom from time to time to: - charitable organizations that are also registered charities under The Income Tax Act (Canada) or -to provide post-secondary scholarships for students graduating from local high schools or - to provide…

C$86k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k4 grants · C$10k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$76k
C$4,500
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$188k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Children's Rehabilitation FoundationC$40,000
Children's Hospital Foundation of ManitobaC$25,500
Hockey Education Reaching Out SocietyC$10,000
Seven Oaks Education Foundation Inc.C$4,500
Children's Heritage FundC$3,000
Tec-Voc Scholarship and Education FundC$1,500
Christmas Cheer Board of Greater WinnipegC$1,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$567k · 15 repeat orgsC$13k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +80% since the first grant, against +45% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
3

Total granted

C$567k
C$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+45%

Still filing today

93%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SEVEN OAKS GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC.
    5× · 2017–2023 · C$161k · revenue +48%
  • CR
    Children's Rehabilitation Foundation
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$101k · revenue +27%
  • SO
    SEVEN OAKS SCHOOL DIVISION
    6× · 2018–2023 · C$100k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • NP
    NORTH POINT DOUGLAS WOMEN'S CENTRE INC.graduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$12k · revenue +45%
  • TV
    TECHNICAL VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL SCHOLARSHIP AND EDUCATION F
    one grant, 2017 · C$1k
  • CM
    CancerCare Manitobagraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$250 · revenue +30%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of Winnipeg Foundation Inc.

The foundation receives donations from annual giving programs and other campaigns. Funds are gifted to the University of Winnipeg for education purposes (scholarships/bursaries) and for capital and capademic enhancement purposes.

—
2
British Columbia's Children's Hospital Foundation

To provide funding to British Columbia's Children's Hospital (a program of Provincial Health Services Authority) for research equipment education health promotion and program development.

—
3
Stollery Children's Hospital Foundation

Funding for grants is provided to the Stollery Children's Hospital the University of Alberta the Women and Children's Health Research Institute the Mental Health Foundation and Alberta Health Services for research and education equipment…

—
4
The Sidney Crosby Foundation

The goal of the foundation is to contribute primarily to qualified donees for the benefit of children.

—
5
Hockey Alberta Foundation

The hockey alberta foundation supports numerous charities/qualified donees to assist in helping kids families and communities access equipment programs mentorship and leadership development with the goal of providing opportunities for kids…

—
6
The Edmonton Oil Kings Junior Hockey Club Scholarship Fund
—
7
Winnipeg Goldeyes Field of Dreams Foundation Inc.

The Foundation donates funds to a wide variety of qualified donees in Winnipeg MB and surrounding communities with a specific emphasis on charities that provide under-privileged and special needs children with the opportunity to…

—
8
Children's Health Foundation

Children's health foundation raises and grants funds to support specialized healthcare research and rehabilitation services and programs for infants children and youth

—
9
Canadian Hockey League Scholarship Trust
—
10
Hospitals of Regina Foundation Inc.

Hospitals of Regina Foundation Inc. provides funding through donations to the Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) and other agencies to improve healthcare for the residents of Southern Saskatchewan. The donations assist these agencies in…

—
11
Hockey Canada Foundation/Fondation Hockey Canada

Assist fund qualifying disbursements to hockey canada

—
12
Royal University Hospital Foundation Inc.

Provide funds raised to Saskatchewan Health Authority for capital construction capital equipment staff education and scholarships fellowships patient care and research within Royal University Hospital. Provide funds raised to the…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Hospital Foundation of Manitoba Inc and the most unlike its peers is Siloam Mission Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
15/16
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSEVEN OAKS GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC. — C$161,070 over 5y, 13% of budgetChildren's Rehabilitation Foundation — C$101,180 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetSEVEN OAKS SCHOOL DIVISION — C$100,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHockey Education Reaching Out Society — C$82,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetSeven Oaks Education Foundation Inc. — C$34,500 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetChildren's Hospital Foundation of Manitoba — C$29,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSILOAM MISSION INC — C$20,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HERITAGE FUND — C$16,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetNORTH POINT DOUGLAS WOMEN'S CENTRE INC. — C$12,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTECHNICAL VOCATIONAL SCHOLARSHIP AND EDUCATION FUND — C$10,000 over 7y, 17% of budgetST AMANT FOUNDATION INC — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetChristmas Cheer Board of Greater Winnipeg — C$1,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWESTLAND FOUNDATION INC. — C$1,200 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetDREAM FACTORY FOUNDATION INC. — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHockey helps The Homeless — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCancerCare Manitoba — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Winnipeg FoundationMB14.3× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Winnipeg Foundation · Giftpact Foundation Inc. · The Jewish Foundation of Manitoba · All Charities Campaign · Wellington West Foundation Inc. · The Cardinal Foundation · The Pollard Family Foundation Inc. · Price Family Foundation Inc. · Alan and Doreen Thompson Charitable Foundation Inc. · Thomas Sill Foundation Inc. · Wcpd Foundation · Kildonan M.C.C. Community Assistance Centre Inc.

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 861549657:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Platinum Jets’ filings →