Bayfield, ON · Charitable organization
Pioneer Park Association
The member of the association provide the following: 1)concerts & entertainment for all ages free to enjoy 2)a venue for weddings 3)benches in the park for viewing sunsets 4)picnic facilities 5)stairs to the lake:supplied and maintained 6)the park with regular maintenance and updates
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BAYFIELD AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY | C$200 |
| BAYFIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETY | C$200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- BABayfield Agricultural Society5× · 2017–2022 · C$2k · revenue +25%
- BHBayfield Historical Society5× · 2018–2022 · C$800 · revenue +29%
- BHBayfield Historical Society3× · 2017–2024 · C$600
Funded once
- ABAsusable Bayfield Conservation Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue +459%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · C$200
- BTBayfield Trail Assocationone grant, 2017 · C$200
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.