Skip to content

Vancouver, BC · Private foundation

Pinecone Charitable Foundation

The charity distributes funds to various religious education and health organizations in canada.

C$18M
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$4.5M
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$4,500,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE TRANSFORMATION FOUNDATIONC$4,500,000
THE KRAWCZYK FAMILY FOUNDATIONC$4,500,000
KNRS CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONC$4,500,000
FRED AND JON SHERMAN & FAMILY FOUNDATIONC$4,500,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 64% of grant dollars (C$18M). The 36% that went abroad (C$10M) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 36% of all-years giving (C$10M)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

32%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$9.1M · 13 repeat orgsC$20M to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
28

Total granted

C$9.1M
C$1.6M

Still filing today

8%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$18M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$3.1M
  • HR
    HUMBER RIVER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · C$2.0M
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL OF GREATER TORONTO
    2× · 2018–2019 · C$1.3M

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2019 · C$378k
  • HP
    HEALTH PARTNERS
    one grant, 2019 · C$220k
  • UW
    United Way of Greater Toronto
    one grant, 2017 · C$205k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Honey & Barry Sherman Legacy Foundation

The foundation receives accumulates and distributes funds to qualified donees as defined under the income tax act (canada)('the act').

—
2
The Krstajic Foundation

To receive and maintain a fund or funds to apply all or part of the principal and income therefrom from time to time to organizations that are qualified donees under the income tax act (canada) ('ita').

—
3
W J Weaver Foundation

Distribute funds and income to 'qualified donees' as defined under the income tax act (canada).

—
4
Khan Family Foundation Inc.

The organization intended to provide support for charitable causes by making donations to those 'qualified donees 'defined in the ita who are engaged in charitable undertakings.

—
5
The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K.

To distribute funds to qualified donees as defined in the income tax act (canada)

—
6
M. Koplowitz Charity Fund

To receive and maintain a fund or funds and to pay or apply all or part of the principal and income therefrom from time to time to 'qualified donees' under the income tax act (canada).

—
7
Sara Korngut Charity Fund

To receive and maintain a fund or funds and apply all or part of the principal and income therefrom from timt to time to qualified donees as defined in subsection 149.1(1) of the income tax act (canada).

—
8
Garry Hurvitz Foundation

Garry hurvitz foundation provides funding to qualfied donees under the income tax act (canada).

—
9
The Rjs Foundation

To receive and maintain a fund or funds and to pay or apply all or part of the principal and income therfrom from time to time to 'qualified donees' under the income tax act (canada).

—
10
Donald Berman Foundation

To distribute its income to registered charities and qualified donees.

—
11
Jesin-Neuberger Charitable Foundation

To receive and maintain a fund or funds and to pay or apply all or part of the principal and income therefrom from time to time to 'qualified donees' under the income tax act (canada).

—
12
Keren One

To recieve and maintain a fund or funds and to apply all or part of the income therefrom from time to time and to qualified donees as defined in subsection 149.1(1) of the income tax act (canada)

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fred and Jon Sherman & Family Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Kehilla Residential Programme. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
2/10
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRED AND JON SHERMAN & FAMILY FOUNDATION — C$4,500,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetTHE TRANSFORMATION FOUNDATION — C$4,500,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetKNRS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — C$4,500,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetSHERMAN FOUNDATION — C$440,000 over 3y, 14% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE KRAWCZYK FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRED AND JON SHERMAN & FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRANSFORMATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KNRS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHERMAN FOUNDATION ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Sherman FoundationBC8.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sherman Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-03-27, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 119212967:2024-03-27 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Pinecone’s filings →