Renfrew, ON · Charitable organization
Pembroke Bible Chapel
Public services for worship prayers and teaching sunday school.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k6 grants · C$13k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$11k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MSC Canada | C$10,900 |
| Africa Inland Mission International (Canada) | C$4,800 |
| ETHNOS Canada | C$4,800 |
| Galilee Bible Camp | C$2,000 |
| Downtown Outreach Bible Chapel | C$600 |
| St. Joseph's Food Bank | C$500 |
| Cornerstone Magazine | C$400 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$900 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- MCMSC Canada8× · 2017–2024 · C$60k · revenue +57%
- AIAfrica Inland Mission International (Canada)8× · 2017–2024 · C$60k · revenue +23%
- GBGAILLEE BIBLE CAMP3× · 2022–2024 · C$5k · revenue +98%
Funded once
- STSHARE THE WORD GLOBALone grant, 2023 · C$100 · revenue +13%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Missionary training -bible studies
Transforming lives through god's word through bible translation bible publishing and bible engagement programs throughout canada and the world.
Our mission is to support and partner with Christian churches and relief organizations around the world to share our faith disciple teach train and serve. We focus on Church Planting & Evangelism Relief & Development and Leadership…
Provide and place Bibles New Testaments Gospels Bible Studies and Scripture booklets worldwide. Provide training for church planter programs. Evangelize educate and instruct persons in Christian commitment and Christian lifestyle. Assist…
Missions support and religious publishing distribution
Missionary trainings On-line and On-site mission trips Church planting trainings
Advancement of the christian faith by the publication of bible teaching resources and evangelistic tools online and in print media
To encourage teach and disciple the christian church around the world.
Publishing and distributing books that advance the Christian faith
(1) oversea and local missionaries (2) bible study (3) pastoral counselling and preaching
Training qualified leaders from around world to effectively evangelize other national christians.
GoodSeed provides tools and training to help people explain the Bible objectively in a way that makes profound sense. The tools are designed for people who have absolutely no knowledge of the Bible. Our tools start at the beginning of the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is ShareWord Global Canada and the most unlike its peers is First Step Options. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MSC Canada ↗
- Who funds Africa Inland Mission International (Canada) ↗
- Who funds ETHNOS Canada ↗
- Who funds GAILLEE BIBLE CAMP ↗
- Who funds Downtown Outreach Bible Chapel ↗
- Who funds First Step Options ↗
- Who funds St. Joseph's Food Bank ↗
- Who funds Cornerstone Magazine ↗
- Who funds SHARE THE WORD GLOBAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.