Welland, ON · Charitable organization
Pelham Executive Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends
Cym (canadian yearly meeting)-annual stipend canadian friends service committee (cfsc) bridge of hope
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CANADIAN YEARLY MEETING | C$1,500 |
| NIAGARA REGION METIS COUNCIL | C$740 |
| BETHANY MENNONITE CHURCH | C$300 |
| CANADIAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE | C$200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CYCANADIAN YEARLY MEETING8× · 2017–2024 · C$9k
- BOBRIDGE OF HOPE6× · 2017–2023 · C$8k
- NRNIAGARA REGION NATIVE CENTRE2× · 2022–2023 · C$1k
Funded once
- JMJOHN MICHAEL SCHOOLone grant, 2023 · C$1k
- CFCANADIAN FRIEND SERVICE COMMITTEEone grant, 2021 · C$700
- BMBRITISH METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCHone grant, 2021 · C$200
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.